Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was received positively

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was received positively" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase in written English.
You would use it when describing how something was perceived by others. For example: The news of the store opening was received positively by local residents.

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The album was received positively; all of the tracks occupied the top positions on all major music charts.

In principle, the general concept of providing information about positive and negative features of options (ie, to participate or not) was received positively and was felt to provide balance to the decision by highlighting all features.

Science

BMJ Open

The poster was received positively by focus groups.

News & Media

The Guardian

News of the conviction was received positively by many in Kigali, Rwanda's capital.

News & Media

The New York Times

She launched a line of clothing and a perfume and developed a collection of footwear, which was received positively by the press and enthusiastically by her legions of Russian-speaking fans.

Consultation by planners was received positively.

In New York, a recent five-day Russian film festival was received positively, but for some in the Russian film industry, this level of interest is not nearly enough.

News & Media

BBC

Lifesong was received positively by music critics.

"Courageous" was received positively by music critics.

Being There was received positively by critics.

"Cripples, Bastards, and Broken Things" was received positively by critics.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing for an international audience be mindful of using "was well-received" as a more common alternative as it carries the same meaning and is widely understood.

Common error

While "was received positively" is grammatically sound, avoid overusing passive voice in your writing. Consider rephrasing to emphasize the actor or cause of the positive reception for a more engaging and direct style. For example, instead of "The proposal was received positively", try "The audience responded positively to the proposal".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was received positively" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state or condition of a subject after it has been received. It indicates that the subject experienced a favorable or approving reception. According to Ludwig AI, it's a grammatically correct phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Wiki

43%

News & Media

30%

Science

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was received positively" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to convey that something was met with approval or a favorable reaction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it adheres to standard grammar rules. It is frequently found in Wiki, News & Media, and Science contexts, highlighting its versatility and broad applicability. When writing, be mindful of potential overuse of passive voice and consider alternatives like "was well-received" or "elicited a positive response" for stylistic variation. Overall, this phrase is a reliable way to communicate positive reception in various writing contexts.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "was received positively"?

You can use alternatives like "was well-received", "was met with approval", or "elicited a positive response" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was positively received" instead of "was received positively"?

Yes, "was positively received" is also grammatically correct and conveys a similar meaning to "was received positively". The choice between the two often comes down to stylistic preference.

How does the formality of "was received positively" compare to its alternatives?

The phrase "was received positively" is generally considered neutral to slightly formal. Alternatives like "was welcomed warmly" might be perceived as more informal, while "gained a favorable reception" maintains a similar level of formality.

In what contexts is "was received positively" most appropriate?

The phrase "was received positively" is suitable in various contexts, including news reports, academic papers, and general writing, to indicate a favorable reaction or acceptance of something such as a proposal, idea, or performance.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: