was received for

USAGE SUMMARY

"was received for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was received by someone for a particular purpose. For example: "The payment was received for the purchase of the new car."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No funding was received for this report.

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection

No funding was received for this manuscript.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

No funding was received for this review.

Bandung: Journal of the Global South

No funding was received for this project.

Annals of Intensive Care

No funding was received for this paper.

IZA Journal of Labor Economics

No funding was received for this article.

Journal of International Humanitarian Action

No funding was received for this work.

Insights into Imaging

No funding was received for manuscript.

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

No funding was received for the study.

Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education

No funding was received for this study.

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

No grant was received for this study.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was received for" to clearly indicate the intended purpose or reason for receiving something. For example, "The grant was received for conducting research on renewable energy."

Common error

Avoid using incorrect prepositions after "was received". Ensure that "for" is used to indicate the purpose, not other prepositions like "to" or "in". For example, instead of saying "The award was received to the project", say "The award was received for the project".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was received for" functions as a passive construction indicating that something was obtained or accepted for a specific purpose. As confirmed by Ludwig, this construction is both grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was received for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction to indicate the purpose or reason behind obtaining something. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and common usage across various contexts, particularly in scientific and formal settings. The phrase effectively conveys the intent behind receiving something, making it a valuable tool for precise and clear communication. When writing, ensure that "for" is used correctly to indicate the intended purpose, avoiding other prepositions that could alter the meaning. Consider using synonyms like "was allocated for" or "was intended for" for variety and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was allocated for

Focuses on the allocation or designation of something for a particular purpose.

was intended for

Emphasizes the intended use or purpose of something.

was designated for

Highlights the official designation of something for a specific purpose.

was obtained for

Focuses on the act of obtaining something for a particular reason.

was acquired for

Suggests that something was gained or secured for a specific purpose.

was earmarked for

Indicates that something was specifically set aside for a particular purpose.

was granted for

Implies that something was officially given or awarded for a specific purpose.

was provided for

Focuses on the provision or supply of something for a specific purpose.

was secured for

Highlights the act of ensuring that something is available for a particular purpose.

was set aside for

Indicates that something was reserved or kept separate for a particular purpose.

FAQs

How can I use "was received for" in a sentence?

Use "was received for" to indicate the reason or purpose for which something was obtained. For example, "The scholarship /s/was+received+for her outstanding academic performance."

What are some alternatives to "was received for"?

You can use alternatives like "/s/was+allocated+for", "/s/was+intended+for", or "/s/was+designated+for", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was received to" instead of "was received for"?

No, it is not correct. The correct preposition to use is "for" to indicate the purpose. "Was received to" is grammatically incorrect in this context.

What's the difference between "was received for" and "was granted for"?

"Was received for" is a general term indicating that something was obtained for a reason. "/s/was+granted+for" implies that something was officially given or awarded for a specific purpose, usually through a formal process.