was re-established

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was re-established" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been restored or set up again after a period of absence or disruption. Example: "After the conflict, the peace treaty was re-established to ensure stability in the region."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

My self-esteem was re-established".

The New York Times

The symbiotic relationship with the fertility clinic was re-established.

The New York Times

Maryland has executed three men since capital punishment was re-established there in 1978.

The New York Times

A communications window opened on Friday morning and contact was re-established with the lander.

The Guardian

Maryland has executed three men since the death penalty was re-established there in 1978.

The New York Times

The buildings were renovated and the working part of the farm was re-established.

The New York Times

The civil war eventually ended in 2006, when an elected parliament was re-established.

The Guardian

It was re-established to take into account the emergency Jar.

The Guardian

Scale removal caused the loss of the epidermis although at 3 days it was re-established.

Molecular Immunology

The court has tried thousands of people since it was re-established in 1992, after a hiatus during the 1980s.

The New York Times

After phone contact was re-established with police "more elements of despair and suicidal thoughts crept in", said Knapman.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was re-established" when you want to emphasize the restoration of something to a previous state after an interruption or period of absence. It's particularly effective in formal writing and historical contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "was re-established" in casual conversation or informal writing where simpler alternatives like "started again" or "brought back" would be more appropriate. The formality of "was re-established" can sound unnatural in everyday contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was re-established" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something (the subject) had been established again. As Ludwig AI points out, it confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and appropriate for use in writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Wiki

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

11%

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was re-established" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction, as noted by Ludwig AI. Its primary function is to indicate the restoration or resumption of something after a period of interruption. Predominantly found in News & Media and Science, the phrase maintains a neutral to formal register. For alternative phrasing, consider options such as "was reinstated" or "was restored", depending on the specific context. Remember to use "was re-established" judiciously, reserving it for scenarios where the formal tone aligns with the writing's intent.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was reinstated

Focuses on restoring someone or something to a former position or state.

was restored

Emphasizes bringing something back to its original condition.

was revived

Highlights bringing something back to life or activity.

was renewed

Suggests a fresh start or continuation after a pause.

was regenerated

Implies a process of regrowth or renewal.

was resurrected

Carries a stronger connotation of bringing something back from near extinction.

was re-instituted

Focuses on formally bringing back a rule or system.

was brought back

A more informal way of saying something was returned.

was re-awakened

Suggests something that was dormant has become active again.

was re-commenced

Emphasizes the resumption of an activity.

FAQs

How can I use "was re-established" in a sentence?

The phrase "was re-established" indicates that something has been set up or brought back again. For example, "After the war, diplomatic relations "were re-established" between the two countries."

What are some alternatives to saying "was re-established"?

You can use alternatives like "was restored", "was revived", or "was reinstated" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was re-establish" instead of "was re-established"?

No, "was re-establish" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "was re-established", using the past participle of the verb "re-establish".

What is the difference between "was re-established" and "was established"?

"was established" means something was set up or created for the first time. "Was re-established" means something that existed before was set up again after a period of being discontinued or removed.