Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Unlike her students, whose report cards she jammed with comments about their strengths and weaknesses, Ms. Moffett was rated with a single letter: S, for satisfactory.
Clinical evaluation was rated with the Harris Hip Score.
Clinical evaluation was rated with the Harris Hip Score [31].
The execution result was rated with value 0.5.
Each child was rated with respect to temperament.
Overall foot disability was rated with a mean of 14 points (range, 12-43 points).
The debriefing was rated with 6.59 (scale ranging from 1, bad to 7, very good) in the DASH©-assessment.
Lanzhou in north-west Gansu ranked last, while Haikou on southern Hainan island was rated with the cleanest air.
When essay #2 was rated with the Rubric it received an overall score of 3.4 which showed a significant increase, t(4) = -3.162, p = 0.034.
The results for the adaptive interface question are shown by (Figure 16), each of the answers from the questionnaire was rated with a score of 1 to 4 (1 being very poor, 4 being very good).
Analyzing the system-generated questions in the context of topic 1, we learned that there was no question that was rated with score 1 (i.e., least understandable, least relevant, and least useful) on average.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com