was quick to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was quick to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe someone who acted promptly or without delay in response to a situation or request. Example: "She was quick to respond to the email, ensuring that the project stayed on track."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Eustis was quick to respond.

The New Yorker

SAB was quick to move.

The Economist

He was quick to answer.

The New Yorker

Israel was quick to dismiss the allegation.

The New York Times

Mr. Giblin was quick to respond.

The New York Times

He was quick to reassure me.

The New York Times

The bride was quick to offer praise.

The New York Times

Dr. Colton was quick to defend it.

The New York Times

Nonacs, thankfully, was quick to understand.

The New Yorker

Mr. Cohen was quick to respond.

The New York Times

Orbitz was quick to declare victory.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was quick to" to emphasize the immediacy of a reaction or response, particularly when highlighting efficiency or readiness.

Common error

Avoid using "was quick to" repeatedly in close proximity; vary your language to maintain reader engagement and prevent monotony.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was quick to" functions as a descriptor, modifying a subject by indicating their promptness in performing an action. Ludwig examples show its use in describing how people, organizations, or even abstract entities immediately react to a situation or statement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

86%

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Science

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was quick to" is a versatile and commonly used expression in English to describe prompt action or responses. Ludwig AI confirms it's a correct and usable phrase. While primarily found in news and media, its neutral register makes it suitable for various contexts, though careful consideration should be given to formality. When writing, avoid overuse and consider alternatives like "responded immediately" or "acted swiftly" to maintain reader engagement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

responded immediately

Focuses on the immediacy of the response, omitting the "was" and "quick to" structure.

acted swiftly

Emphasizes the speed of the action, using "swiftly" instead of "quick".

promptly addressed

Highlights the act of dealing with something without delay, often in a formal context.

reacted without hesitation

Indicates a lack of delay due to uncertainty or doubt.

lost no time in

Suggests an immediate start to an action, emphasizing the absence of delay.

moved rapidly to

Implies a fast transition to a subsequent action or state.

was immediate in

Uses "immediate" as an adjective to describe the response, altering the sentence structure.

showed alacrity in

Replaces "quick to" with "alacrity", indicating eagerness and promptness.

demonstrated speed in

Highlights the speed of the response using "demonstrated speed".

offered an immediate response

Focuses on the immediacy and the nature of the response, presenting it as an "immediate response".

FAQs

How can I use "was quick to" in a sentence?

"Was quick to" is used to describe someone or something that acted promptly. For example: "She "was quick to respond" to the email".

What are some alternatives to "was quick to"?

Alternatives include "responded immediately", "acted swiftly", or "promptly addressed", depending on the specific context.

Is "was quick to" formal or informal?

"Was quick to" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts, although more formal alternatives might be preferable in certain situations.

What's the difference between "was quick to" and "was eager to"?

"Was quick to" emphasizes the speed of a response, while "was eager to" highlights enthusiasm or willingness. For example, "He "was quick to answer" the question" implies he answered promptly, while "He "was eager to answer" the question" suggests he was enthusiastic about answering.