Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was queried for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was queried for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone or something was asked for information or clarification regarding a specific topic or item. Example: "The database was queried for the latest sales figures to analyze the performance of the product."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The prescription file was queried for the presence of filled statin (atorvastatin, cerivastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin) prescriptions.
PubMed database was queried for articles published in the last 10 years describing allergic reactions following vaccination.
PubMed was queried for articles published in English from January 1990 to September 2016 with the terms "liposarcoma" and "colon".
Science
Our institutional Trauma registry was queried for patients 0 18 years of age who were admitted between 5/2008 and 10/2015 with a diagnosis of PC.
The electronic medical record (EMR) database was queried for patients who had a discharge diagnosis of "open wound of lip, tongue, mouth, gum, face, buccal mucosa, or palate" between January 1 , 2012and December 31 , 2012
This database was queried for Slc39a4 among the top ten percent of genes expressed in tumors.
Science
The AFD was queried for taxa listed in Table S1 by IMCRA 4.0 provincial bioregions.
Science
The MicrobesOnline database [27] was queried for the E.coli orphan genes using their unique VIMSS ID.
Science
The Florida Cancer Data System dataset was queried for all patients undergoing treatment for gynecologic cancers from 1990 2000.
Science
The GBIF portal was queried for georeferenced data (i.e. those with latitude/longitude coordinates) using custom web-scraping scripts in a batch process.
Science
VA ESSENCE was queried for the ILI syndrome group as well as the individual ICD-9-CM codes that comprise the ILI group for both time periods.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was queried for", ensure the subject of the sentence clearly identifies the database or system being searched. This provides clarity and context for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "was queried for" without specifying what was actually queried. For example, instead of writing "Data was queried for results", specify the database: "The clinical database was queried for patient outcomes".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was queried for" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that a database or system underwent a search for specific information. This usage is supported by Ludwig's examples, where databases and registries are frequently the subjects of the query.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was queried for" is a grammatically correct and frequently employed term, predominantly within scientific and academic writing. Ludwig AI confirms its appropriateness for describing database searches and data retrieval processes. To ensure clarity, always specify the database or system being queried. While alternatives like "was searched for" exist, "was queried for" is particularly fitting for structured database interactions. Therefore, using "was queried for" precisely and contextually enhances the accuracy and professionalism of your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was searched for
Focuses more generally on the act of searching a database or resource.
was checked for
Highlights the act of verifying the presence or absence of something.
was requested for
Emphasizes the act of asking for specific information.
was investigated for
Implies a more thorough and in-depth examination than a simple query.
was examined for
Suggests a careful and detailed inspection of the data.
was mined for
Emphasizes the extraction of valuable information from a large dataset.
was explored for
Suggests a broader and less focused investigation.
was consulted for
Suggests seeking expert advice or information.
was canvassed for
Focuses on gathering information or opinions from a specific group.
was probed for
Indicates a careful and sensitive attempt to extract information.
FAQs
What does "was queried for" mean?
The phrase "was queried for" indicates that a database, system, or source was searched or asked for specific information. It's commonly used in research, data analysis, and technical documentation.
How can I rephrase "was queried for" in a sentence?
You can use alternatives like "was searched for", "was examined for", or "was investigated for" depending on the context.
Is it appropriate to use "was queried for" in formal writing?
Yes, "was queried for" is suitable for formal and scientific writing, particularly when describing database searches or data analysis procedures.
What's the difference between "was queried for" and "was searched for"?
While both phrases imply a search, "was queried for" often suggests a more structured and specific request, typical of database interactions. "Was searched for" is a more general term applicable to broader search contexts.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested