Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was provided for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"was provided for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to indicate that something has been given, allocated, set aside or made available for someone's use. For example: "A comfortable apartment was provided for the refugee family."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(20)
was allocated to
was supplied to
was arranged for
was furnished with
was made available to
was designated for
was set aside for
was reserved for
was equipped with
was referred for
was acknowledged for
was secured for
was ordered for
was established for
was achieved for
was ascertained for
was information for
was secure for
currently provided for
well provided for
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
(No evidence was provided for the accusation).
News & Media
"Everything was O.K. — not great, but security was provided for".
News & Media
Independent failure criterion was provided for each stress component.
An individual RT prescription was provided for every study patient.
For the teenagers, a record player was provided for entertainment.
News & Media
No time frame was provided for a potential deal.
News & Media
No intervention was provided for the control group.
No funding was provided for this study.
No funding was provided for this research.
Science
That's not what the money was provided for.
News & Media
Finally, space was provided for participants to include additional comments.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was provided for", ensure the sentence clearly indicates both what was provided and the intended recipient or purpose to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
While "was provided for" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make writing sound indirect. Consider active voice constructions when appropriate for a more direct and engaging tone.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was provided for" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has been given or made available. It is typically used to show that a resource, service, or opportunity has been allocated or supplied to someone or something, as confirmed by Ludwig.
Frequent in
Science
63%
News & Media
28%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Wiki
3%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was provided for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction, which serves to indicate that something has been supplied or made available. According to Ludwig, this phrase is common across diverse contexts, including science, news, and formal business settings. While versatile, writers should be mindful of potential overuse of passive voice. By understanding its function and purpose, writers can effectively use "was provided for" in their writing. Its widespread use is confirmed by Ludwig and its analysis of numerous examples.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was allocated to
Focuses on the act of assigning or distributing something for a specific purpose, highlighting the recipient.
was supplied to
Emphasizes the act of furnishing or delivering something necessary or useful, focusing on the source.
was arranged for
Highlights the act of planning or organizing something to meet a particular need or purpose.
was furnished with
Focuses on equipping or supplying something with what is needed, often related to equipment or amenities.
was made available to
Emphasizes the act of ensuring something can be used or accessed by someone, highlighting accessibility.
was designated for
Highlights a specific purpose or recipient that something has been officially assigned to.
was set aside for
Emphasizes the act of reserving or allocating something for a particular use or time.
was reserved for
Focuses on keeping something available exclusively for a specific person or purpose.
was catered for
Emphasizes that specific needs have been taken into consideration and addressed.
was equipped with
Focuses on the provision of necessary tools or resources to enable a certain functionality or capability.
FAQs
How can I use "was provided for" in a sentence?
Use "was provided for" to indicate that something was supplied or made available to someone or for a specific purpose. For example, "Housing was provided for the refugees" or "Funding was provided for the research project".
What are some alternatives to "was provided for"?
Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "was allocated to", "was supplied to", or "was arranged for".
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was provided for"?
While "was provided for" is in the passive voice, it is grammatically correct. However, consider using the active voice when it makes the sentence clearer and more direct. For example, instead of "Assistance was provided for the victims", you could say "We provided assistance to the victims".
What's the difference between "was provided for" and "was intended for"?
"Was provided for" indicates that something was actually supplied, while "was intended for" implies a planned or designated use that may not have actually occurred. For example, "The grant was provided for research" means the research received the grant, whereas "The grant was intended for research" means the research was the planned recipient but may not have received it.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested