Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was provided for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was provided for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to indicate that something has been given, allocated, set aside or made available for someone's use. For example: "A comfortable apartment was provided for the refugee family."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(No evidence was provided for the accusation).

News & Media

The New Yorker

"Everything was O.K. — not great, but security was provided for".

News & Media

The New Yorker

Independent failure criterion was provided for each stress component.

An individual RT prescription was provided for every study patient.

For the teenagers, a record player was provided for entertainment.

News & Media

The New York Times

No time frame was provided for a potential deal.

News & Media

The New York Times

No intervention was provided for the control group.

No funding was provided for this study.

No funding was provided for this research.

That's not what the money was provided for.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Finally, space was provided for participants to include additional comments.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was provided for", ensure the sentence clearly indicates both what was provided and the intended recipient or purpose to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

While "was provided for" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make writing sound indirect. Consider active voice constructions when appropriate for a more direct and engaging tone.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was provided for" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has been given or made available. It is typically used to show that a resource, service, or opportunity has been allocated or supplied to someone or something, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

63%

News & Media

28%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was provided for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction, which serves to indicate that something has been supplied or made available. According to Ludwig, this phrase is common across diverse contexts, including science, news, and formal business settings. While versatile, writers should be mindful of potential overuse of passive voice. By understanding its function and purpose, writers can effectively use "was provided for" in their writing. Its widespread use is confirmed by Ludwig and its analysis of numerous examples.

FAQs

How can I use "was provided for" in a sentence?

Use "was provided for" to indicate that something was supplied or made available to someone or for a specific purpose. For example, "Housing was provided for the refugees" or "Funding was provided for the research project".

What are some alternatives to "was provided for"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "was allocated to", "was supplied to", or "was arranged for".

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was provided for"?

While "was provided for" is in the passive voice, it is grammatically correct. However, consider using the active voice when it makes the sentence clearer and more direct. For example, instead of "Assistance was provided for the victims", you could say "We provided assistance to the victims".

What's the difference between "was provided for" and "was intended for"?

"Was provided for" indicates that something was actually supplied, while "was intended for" implies a planned or designated use that may not have actually occurred. For example, "The grant was provided for research" means the research received the grant, whereas "The grant was intended for research" means the research was the planned recipient but may not have received it.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: