Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "was probably flawed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing something that is likely to have defects or shortcomings, often in a speculative context. Example: "The initial design of the product was probably flawed, leading to numerous customer complaints."
Exact(1)
"The design of the Public Integrity Commission was probably flawed from its very existence," said one of the officials helping draft the proposal, who insisted on anonymity because the plan was being finalized.
Similar(59)
It is probably flawed in that it depends on a deus ex machina in the form of a certain incriminating legal document which is rather casually crowbarred into the screenplay.
It's probably flawed from a customer point of view because the Big Six can make things very difficult".
As such, extrapolating this study to all ICU patients is probably flawed.
The mechanisms by which cofactors facilitate nuclear entry are still largely hypothetical and, like all good models, ours is probably flawed, but testable.
The current strategy of using transrectal biopsy or histologic outcomes from surgery as a means to validate new biomarkers is probably flawed because of the inherent spectrum and selection biases that result.
A federal law intended to shield children from online pornography was dealt a second setback today, as an appellate court upheld a lower court order against its enforcement and declared that the statute was probably fatally flawed.
Friends, family and law enforcement officials say that if Mr. Dillon had a fateful flaw, it was probably his supreme confidence in his own cleverness.
The drive for revenge was probably Richard Nixon's greatest flaw.
Zack Snyder's movie version of the DC Comics graphic novel Watchmen is a fantastically deranged epic; it might be making a bid for flawed-masterpiece status, except that it is probably more flaw than masterpiece.
"Well, it sounds O.K. to me, but there's probably a flaw somewhere.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com