was previously published

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was previously published" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a particular work or piece of information has been made public before the current reference or context. Example: "The article was previously published in a renowned journal, making it a credible source for our research."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A version of this article was previously published on Eyewoke.

The Guardian

It was previously published in 1929 and 1955.

The Guardian - Books

Experimental protocol of SE-iFISH was previously published [7].

Clinical and Translational Medicine

This technique was previously published in detail [18].

The Journal of Headache and Pain

* This story was previously published on Dec. 24, 1997.

Forbes

This article was previously published on LetMeStartBySayingBlog.com.

Huffington Post

This post was previously published on AdventuresofEmptyNesters.com.

Huffington Post

This post was previously published on coolkidzcooltrips.com.

Huffington Post

This was previously published on PoopPeePuke.com.com

Huffington Post

This post was previously published on www.jessicashaool.com.jessicashaool.com

Huffington Post

This post was previously published here.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating that a work has been published before, use "was previously published" to establish precedence and avoid accusations of plagiarism or redundancy. Make sure to provide the original publication details.

Common error

Avoid using active voice or present tense when referring to a past publication. For example, don't say "This article previously publishes on..." Instead, use the passive voice and past tense: "This article "was previously published" on..."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was previously published" functions as a passive construction used to indicate that a particular work or piece of information has been made public at an earlier time. As confirmed by Ludwig, it accurately conveys the meaning of prior publication.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Science

26%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was previously published" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate that a work has been published before. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to provide context about the publication history of a piece of content. It's commonly found in news and media, as well as scientific writing. When using the phrase, ensure you're using the correct tense and voice, and always provide details about the original publication to avoid any confusion or accusations of plagiarism. Alternatives include "appeared earlier" or "had been published earlier". Finally, avoid redundancies like "was previously published before".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had been published earlier

Indicates the publishing action took place earlier, but with a different tense.

appeared earlier

Focuses on the act of appearing in a publication, rather than the publishing itself.

has been released before

Emphasizes the act of releasing information to the public at an earlier time.

was issued before

Focuses on the formal issuing or distribution of the content.

saw print earlier

Highlights the occurrence of the content in printed form before a specific point.

was disseminated before

Formally indicates the wide spreading of information at an earlier time.

was circulated earlier

Emphasizes the circulation or distribution aspect of publishing.

was in print prior to

Formally indicates that something was printed before the present.

featured in

Focuses on the content being featured in a particular publication.

originated in

Highlights the source or origin of the publication.

FAQs

How can I use "was previously published" in a sentence?

You can use "was previously published" to indicate that a piece of content has appeared in a publication before. For example, "This article "was previously published" in The New York Times."

What are some alternatives to saying "was previously published"?

Some alternatives include "appeared earlier", "had been published earlier", or "has been released before", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "was previously published before"?

Yes, saying "was previously published before" is redundant because "previously" already implies "before". Just use "was previously published".

What's the difference between "was published" and "was previously published"?

"Was published" simply indicates that something has been made public. "Was previously published" indicates that it has been published at an earlier time, implying a history or prior existence.