was placed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was placed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in a context where someone or something is physically assigned to a particular place, job, or role. For example, "The rookie firefighter was placed with an experienced crew."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Instead, he was placed with Ms. Worrell.

The New York Times

Raymond was placed with a foster mother, Carmen Vazquez.

The New York Times

Then in 2001, Stephanie was placed with Ms. Johnson, a 50-year-old retired nurse.

The New York Times

After considerable investigation and assessment, Charles was placed with his aunt in Uganda.

The Guardian - Opinion

"The allocation was made before the order was placed with the broker," he testified.

The New York Times

The sooner the monkey was placed with the surrogate, the better it fared, the researchers found.

The New York Times - Health

After her mother's death, Mrs. Nivoix-Sevestre was placed with foster parents, then in an orphanage.

The New York Times

He was placed with Lambeth social services when he was just three.

The Guardian - Books

Elijah was placed with Ms. Banton because of his low scores on reading and writing tests.

The New York Times

West was placed with four spades and three hearts: seven known and six unknown.

The New York Times - Arts

The bank says the entire issue was placed with international investors.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was placed with", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what is being placed and with whom or what they are being associated.

Common error

Avoid using "was placed with" when a simple preposition like 'in' or 'at' would be more appropriate. "Was placed with" implies a specific connection or assignment, not just general location.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was placed with" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject received the action of being positioned or assigned in relation to another entity. Ludwig shows this usage across numerous contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

39%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Reference

2%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was placed with" is a versatile and common construction used to describe the act of assigning or connecting someone or something to another entity. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and appropriate for various contexts. Its prevalence in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings underscores its broad applicability. Remember that while alternatives exist, the specific context should guide your choice to maintain clarity and precision. Using "was placed with" effectively involves ensuring the relationship between the subjects is clear and purposeful.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was assigned to

Implies a formal assignment to a role or location.

was allocated to

Highlights the distribution or allotment of resources or individuals.

was connected to

Suggests a linkage or association with something.

was joined with

Indicates being united or linked with something else.

was situated with

Focuses on the physical location or positioning.

was partnered with

Emphasizes a collaborative relationship or pairing.

was teamed up with

Similar to 'partnered', but often implies a less formal arrangement.

was located alongside

Indicates proximity or adjacency.

was incorporated with

Suggests inclusion or integration into a larger entity.

was deposited alongside

Implies a careful or deliberate placement.

FAQs

How can I use "was placed with" in a sentence?

Use "was placed with" to indicate assignment or association, such as "The child "was placed with a foster family"" or "The equipment "was placed with the research team"".

What are some alternatives to "was placed with"?

Alternatives include "was assigned to", "was connected to", or "was allocated to" depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was placed with" or should I use another preposition?

The correctness depends on the context. "Was placed with" is appropriate when indicating a specific association or assignment. Other prepositions might be more suitable for different relationships, such as "was placed in" for location or "was placed under" for supervision.

What does "was placed with" imply about the relationship between the subjects?

"Was placed with" suggests a deliberate act of assigning or connecting one entity to another. It often indicates a structured or purposeful relationship, such as in fostering, team assignments, or resource allocation.