was of no consequence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was of no consequence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is unimportant or does not matter in a given context. Example: "The delay in the project was of no consequence, as we had ample time to complete the work."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

46 human-written examples

But this was of no consequence.

The New Yorker

Taste was of no consequence.

The New Yorker

Whether or not a car accident occurred was of no consequence.

The New Yorker

It was of no consequence that my candidate, Jon Huntsman, didn't win, ever.

The Guardian - Opinion

But as the game progressed, it became increasingly apparent that Maradona's condition was of no consequence.

The New York Times - Sports

Usually his absence was of no consequence as he was "paired" with an absent Tory.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

14 human-written examples

They are of no consequence.

Independent

The sauce is of no consequence.

The New Yorker

"It's of no consequence," he replied.

The Guardian

Weather conditions and proximity of land are of no consequence.

Yale University

But, after all, it's of no consequence.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Vary your vocabulary by using synonyms like "was immaterial" or "didn't matter" to enhance readability and avoid repetition. This demonstrates a broader command of language.

Common error

While acceptable, "was of no consequence" can sound somewhat verbose in formal contexts. Opt for more concise alternatives like "was irrelevant" or "didn't matter" to maintain clarity and conciseness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was of no consequence" functions as a predicate adjective, modifying the subject of a sentence to indicate that it is unimportant or irrelevant. This is supported by Ludwig AI's analysis.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Science

27%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was of no consequence" is a grammatically correct and relatively common expression used to denote that something is unimportant or irrelevant. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and offers suitable alternatives such as "was immaterial" or "didn't matter". Predominantly found in News & Media, Science, and Academic contexts, this phrase provides a more sophisticated way to dismiss significance, though conciseness should be considered in more formal settings. By understanding its appropriate usage and potential pitfalls, writers can effectively employ "was of no consequence" to convey the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was immaterial

Focuses on the lack of relevance or importance.

didn't matter

A more direct and informal way of saying something was unimportant.

was irrelevant

Highlights the lack of connection or pertinence to the matter at hand.

was insignificant

Emphasizes the smallness or unimportance of something.

was inconsequential

Similar to insignificant, but slightly more formal.

bore no significance

Highlights the lack of importance or meaning.

had no importance

A straightforward way of stating that something was not important.

was beside the point

Indicates that something is not relevant to the current discussion or situation.

was negligible

Suggests that something is so small or unimportant that it can be disregarded.

had no bearing

Emphasizes the lack of influence or effect on something.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "was of no consequence"?

You can use alternatives like "was immaterial", "didn't matter", or "was irrelevant" depending on the context.

How to use "was of no consequence" in a sentence?

This phrase is used to indicate that something is unimportant or has no significant impact. For example: "The delay in the project "was of no consequence", as we had ample time to complete the work."

Which is correct, "was of no consequence" or "were of no consequence"?

The correct form depends on the subject's number. Use "was of no consequence" for singular subjects and "were of no consequence" for plural subjects.

What is the difference between "was of no consequence" and "was not important"?

"Was of no consequence" is a more formal way of saying "was not important". While they share a similar meaning, "was of no consequence" can add a slightly stronger emphasis on the lack of impact.