Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(12)
Inherent problems with LBT include difficulty in distinguishing SIBO from rapid intestinal transit where similar gas production patterns are observed (false positivity) [ 3].
The presence of a second sniffing episode was observed during false positives, true positives, and false negatives, but not during true negative samples (χ 3 = 82.79, P < 0.001).
Overall, only a single error was observed for enrofloxacin (false resistant Proteus) and for sulfamethoxazole with trimethoprim (false susceptible Enterococcus).
No discernable sequence pattern was observed for these false deletions.
One false negative was observed on STRB, and 20 false negatives were observed on BA.
One false negative isolate was observed on GBSDA, and three false positives on CA. In conclusion, rectovaginal sampling increased the number GBS positive women detected, compared to vaginal and/or rectal sampling.
At 100 MLD50/mL, a >7% false-negative rate in TPGY was observed; at 10,000 MLD50/mL, a 1.5% false-positive rate for BoNT-A and a 28.6% false-positive rate for BoNT-F occurred (5 ).
Only 1 false positive was observed in the top 10 ranked analogs by K*, and 6 false positives by the 20 μM IC50 cutoff were observed in the top 20.
One false-positive result was observed in full trisomy 13 and two false-positives in cases of mosaicism.
One "false closure" was observed at Cannon Hill during which a train did not pass.
No significant difference was observed between true positives and false positives with 4DST (4.1 ± 2.2 vs. 5.4 ± 3.2; P = 0.16), but there was a significant difference between them with FDG (2.1 ± 0.6 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4; P = 0.03).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com