Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was noted as
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"was noted as" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that somebody remarked on or made note of a certain fact. For example, "Her efforts in improving the school were noted as exemplary by the principal."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Encyclopedias
News & Media
Wiki
Alternative expressions(17)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
An anomalous increase in the transmittance at 35°C was noted as well.
Science
While that predilection was noted as early as the sixteenth century, masochism was not codified as a concept until 1890.
Academia
Where possible, other relevant information was noted as well.
Varying academic performance associated with enrollment cutoff date was noted as early as the 1960s.
Poorly-defined convection was noted as well as good outflow and a weak circulation.
Wiki
Interestingly, the clinical effect was noted as early as 1 week after the initiation of treatment.
Colleoni himself was noted as a patron of art.
Encyclopedias
A trend of increased variability was noted as the complexity, number of steps, and materials involved increased.
Science
Overall image quality was noted as good or poor, and the effect of image quality on tip localization was analyzed.
Against β-glucosidase enzyme, compound 6 g was noted as the lead inhibitor with IC50 value of 0.08 ± 0.002 μM.
Science
Based on our preliminary survey, participation in regular exercise to improve health was noted as a priority for FCs.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was noted as" when you want to convey that something was specifically observed, recorded, or mentioned, often with a degree of formality or official recognition. For instance, "The improvement in patient condition was noted as significant by the medical team."
Common error
Avoid using "was noted as" in very informal writing; opt for simpler alternatives like "was mentioned" or "was seen" for a more natural tone. Overusing formal phrases can make your writing sound stilted or unnatural.
Source & Trust
79%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was noted as" serves as a passive reporting verb construction. It indicates that a particular observation, fact, or characteristic was officially recorded or recognized. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. The phrase emphasizes that information has been formally acknowledged.
Frequent in
Science
73%
Encyclopedias
11%
News & Media
9%
Less common in
Wiki
7%
Formal & Business
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was noted as" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that serves to report observations, facts, or characteristics in a formal, objective manner. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it signifies that information has been officially recognized or documented. While versatile, it should be used judiciously in informal writing to maintain an appropriate tone. Alternatives such as "was mentioned as" or "was recorded as" can be used to subtly alter the meaning or formality. By understanding its nuances, writers can effectively incorporate "was noted as" into their writing to convey accurate and reliable information.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was mentioned as
Focuses on the act of bringing something to attention verbally or in writing. Meaning is almost identical.
was recorded as
Emphasizes the act of documenting something formally. Similar in meaning, focusing on written records.
was recognized as
Stresses the acknowledgement or acceptance of something. The core meaning is the same.
was identified as
Highlights the process of recognizing or discovering something specific. Meaning is slightly different, focusing on identification.
was regarded as
Indicates how something is viewed or considered. Differs slightly in connotation, implying an opinion.
was characterized as
Focuses on describing or defining something's qualities. The core meaning stays untouched.
was deemed as
Suggests a formal judgment or assessment. Implies an official decision.
was perceived as
Emphasizes how something is understood or interpreted by others. The core meaning remains.
was classified as
Highlights the act of categorizing something into a specific group. Meaning is similar, centering on classification.
was designated as
Implies a formal assignment or naming of something. Different context, focuses on designation.
FAQs
How can I use "was noted as" in a sentence?
"Was noted as" is used to indicate that something was observed or recorded. For example, "The increase in sales was noted as a positive trend".
What can I say instead of "was noted as"?
You can use alternatives like "was mentioned as", "was recorded as", or "was identified as" depending on the context.
Is "was noted as" formal or informal?
"Was noted as" is generally considered a formal phrase. In informal contexts, simpler alternatives like "was mentioned" might be more appropriate.
What's the difference between "was noted as" and "was observed as"?
"Was noted as" implies that something was specifically recorded or mentioned, while "was observed as" suggests that something was visually or empirically detected. The difference lies in the method of recognition.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
79%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested