Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was not visible

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not visible" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that could not be seen or was hidden from view at a particular time or in a specific context. Example: "During the presentation, the important data was not visible on the screen due to a technical issue."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(It was not visible from Europe).

Tomlinson's bleeding, however, was not visible.

News & Media

The Guardian

Their physical strength was not visible.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The courageous cyclist's face was not visible in the photo.

News & Media

The Guardian

A 2004 transit was not visible from the western US.

News & Media

The Guardian

"I just was not visible in New York.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Che was not visible; he was standing behind the rostrum.

Such optimism was not visible in the chamber.

The attack itself was not visible on surveillance cameras.

Sometimes it was not visible, held behind the door post.

Flotus's expression was not visible from our angle".

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not visible", ensure the context clearly indicates what obscured the visibility. Providing this context enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity. For example, instead of "The damage was not visible", write "The damage was not visible due to the thick layer of dust."

Common error

Avoid using "was not visible" without specifying why something was not visible. Overusing the phrase in this way can make your writing vague and less informative. Be specific about the reason for the lack of visibility.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not visible" functions as a descriptive statement, indicating the absence of visual perception. It typically modifies a noun, specifying that the noun could not be seen. Ludwig AI confirms this with numerous examples across diverse sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

42%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was not visible" is a common and grammatically sound way to express that something could not be seen. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability and widespread use. It appears frequently in "News & Media" and scientific contexts, demonstrating its versatility. When using this phrase, ensure you provide sufficient context to explain why something was not visible to enhance clarity. Consider alternatives like "could not be seen" or "was imperceptible" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

FAQs

What does "was not visible" mean?

The phrase "was not visible" means that something could not be seen or perceived. It implies an absence of visual detectability, whether due to obstruction, distance, or other factors.

What can I say instead of "was not visible"?

Alternatives to "was not visible" include "could not be seen", "was imperceptible", or "was undetectable", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

How do I use "was not visible" in a sentence?

Use "was not visible" to describe something that could not be seen at a particular time or under certain conditions. For example, "The ship was not visible through the fog" or "The tumor was not visible on the initial X-ray."

Is it better to use "could not be seen" or "was not visible"?

Both "could not be seen" and "was not visible" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. The choice between them often depends on personal preference or the specific context. "Was not visible" may sound slightly more formal.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: