Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was not introduced
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was not introduced" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something or someone was not presented or made known in a particular context. Example: "The new policy was not introduced during the meeting, leaving many employees confused about the changes."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Science
Academia
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Videotape recording was not introduced until 1956.
News & Media
But Phifer was not introduced as a championship guru.
News & Media
Plante was not introduced to Spender's wife, Natasha.
News & Media
But this evidence was not introduced in court.
News & Media
(The Sunfire was not introduced until the 1995 model year).
News & Media
In fact, a law necessitating these practices was not introduced until 1976.
Encyclopedias
Except he was not introduced as a columnist for Sports Illustrated.
News & Media
Its worship is Baptist in form, though the institution of Communion was not introduced until 1971.
Encyclopedias
The term transgenic, however, was not introduced to describe such organisms until the early 1980s.
Encyclopedias
The tomato was not introduced to Europe from Mexico until the 16th century.
News & Media
In both situations, Mr. Kearney was not introduced as a Maximus consultant, these officials said.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was not introduced", ensure the context clearly indicates what was not presented, implemented, or made known. Be specific about the subject and the situation to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "was not introduced" when a stronger verb like "rejected", "ignored", or "suppressed" more accurately reflects the situation. The phrase implies a lack of presentation, not necessarily active opposition or disregard.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was not introduced" primarily functions as a verbal phrase indicating the absence of a formal presentation or implementation. It's used to state that something did not come into effect, was not presented, or did not become known in a specific context. Ludwig's examples show how this phrase is employed across various domains to denote the non-occurrence of an introduction.
Frequent in
News & Media
35%
Science
25%
Encyclopedias
15%
Less common in
Academia
10%
Wiki
10%
Formal & Business
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was not introduced" is a versatile and commonly used phrase that clearly indicates the absence of a formal presentation, implementation, or acknowledgment. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is grammatically sound and appropriate for various contexts, including news, science, and encyclopedic writing. While its register is generally neutral, formality can be adjusted by the surrounding language. When employing this phrase, clarity is crucial; ensure the context specifies precisely what "was not introduced" to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was not presented
Replaces "introduced" with "presented", focusing on the act of showing or making something available.
was not implemented
Substitutes "introduced" with "implemented", highlighting the lack of practical application or enforcement.
was not established
Uses "established" instead of "introduced", emphasizing the absence of setting up or creating something.
was not initiated
Replaces "introduced" with "initiated", focusing on the absence of a starting action or process.
was not unveiled
Uses "unveiled" to replace "introduced", highlighting the lack of a formal reveal or announcement.
was not brought in
Replaces "introduced" with the phrasal verb "brought in", focusing on the act of including something.
was not rolled out
Uses "rolled out" instead of "introduced", emphasizing the lack of a phased implementation or launch.
did not exist
Uses a more general expression of non-existence instead of focusing on the introduction itself.
was not known
Focuses on the lack of awareness or knowledge about something.
was not disclosed
Emphasizes that something was not revealed or made public.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "was not introduced" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was not implemented", "was not established", or "was not presented", depending on the specific context.
What is the difference between "was not introduced" and "was not adopted"?
"Was not introduced" means something was never presented or made known, while "was not adopted" implies something was presented but not accepted or implemented. Adoption suggests a conscious decision, whereas introduction focuses on initial presentation.
Is it correct to say "was not introduced yet"?
Yes, saying "was not introduced yet" is grammatically correct and indicates that something is expected to be introduced at a later time. It implies a future possibility of introduction.
What are some common contexts where "was not introduced" is used?
The phrase "was not introduced" is commonly used in discussions about policies, technologies, historical events, or legal matters where a specific element or concept did not come into play or was not formally presented. It can be used in science, news, encyclopedias and other contexts.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested