Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was not analyzed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not analyzed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has not been examined or studied in detail. Example: "The data from the experiment was not analyzed due to time constraints."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

GSE16113 was not reprocessed, as it was not analyzed by a standard microarray.

Science & Research

Nature

Cervical pain was not analyzed.

One eligible patient refused all treatment and was not analyzed.

Why these big oversights occurred was not analyzed.

*Sample Ou 2 was not analyzed by Spain 2 lab.

The differential expression of skeletal muscle VGSC however was not analyzed in the present study.

Data was not analyzed until the full N of 501 was achieved.

Moreover, its complexity was not analyzed, and measurement noise was not explicitly considered.

Although an environmental review was done, solar impact was not analyzed because of the industrial location.

News & Media

Los Angeles Times

In our study rs1374324 was not analyzed.

Science

Plosone

The role of GSK3 inhibiton on differentiation was not analyzed.

Science

Plosone
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not analyzed", ensure the reason for the lack of analysis is clear to maintain transparency and avoid ambiguity. For example, specify if it was due to data limitations, scope constraints, or methodological choices.

Common error

Avoid assuming readers understand why something "was not analyzed". Explicitly state the reason to prevent misinterpretations or assumptions about potential oversights.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not analyzed" serves as a declarative statement indicating the absence of analysis on a particular subject or dataset. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct. Examples include statements like "Data was not analyzed until the full N of 501 was achieved."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

86%

News & Media

5%

Academia

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was not analyzed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, particularly in scientific and academic writing, to indicate that something has not undergone detailed examination. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability in English writing. When using this phrase, it's crucial to provide context regarding the reasons for the lack of analysis to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "was not investigated", "was not examined", and "was not studied" can be used depending on the specific context. Being clear about what "was not analyzed" is important to avoid the impression that something was overlooked or neglected.

FAQs

What does "was not analyzed" mean in research?

In research, "was not analyzed" means that specific data, samples, or variables weren't subjected to detailed examination or statistical processing for various reasons, such as scope limitations, data unavailability, or methodological constraints.

What are some alternatives to "was not analyzed"?

You can use alternatives like "was not investigated", "was not examined", or "was not studied" depending on the context.

Why is it important to specify when something "was not analyzed" in a report?

Specifying that something "was not analyzed" is crucial for transparency. It clarifies the boundaries of the study, prevents assumptions of oversight, and helps readers understand the scope and limitations of the findings.

Is it acceptable to use "was not analyzed" in formal writing?

Yes, "was not analyzed" is perfectly acceptable in formal writing, particularly in scientific and academic contexts, as long as it's used clearly and the reasons for not analyzing something are adequately explained.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: