was met

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was met" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that someone encountered or faced a particular situation or response. Example: "The proposal was met with enthusiasm from the committee members."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"I was met with giggles.

The New York Times

It was met with silence.

Independent

III was met with fury.

The New Yorker

Skinner's erudition was met with surprise.

Independent

Our protest was met with a shrug.

The New York Times

The request was met with silence.

The New York Times

Her speech was met with boos.

Independent

I was met with perplexity and hostility.

Independent

He was met with blank looks.

The New Yorker

But I was met with silence.

The New Yorker

Dissent was met with increasing repressive force.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was met" to clearly indicate a response or reaction to an action or statement. Ensure the context makes clear who or what is doing the meeting and what the response consists of. Example: "The proposal was met with enthusiasm."

Common error

Avoid using "was met" when an active construction is more appropriate or clear. For example, instead of "The problem was met by a solution", consider "A solution addressed the problem."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was met" functions as part of a passive construction, indicating how an action, statement, or proposal was received. Ludwig's examples demonstrate its use in describing reactions ranging from positive reception to negative responses.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Wiki

25%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Science

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was met" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that describes the reception or response to an action, statement, or proposal. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is commonly used in neutral contexts such as news articles and encyclopedic entries. Alternatives like "was greeted with" or "encountered" can be used to vary the language. When using "was met", it is important to understand passive voice and to ensure that it is used in appropriate contexts. The analysis also provides best practices to follow and errors to avoid, enhancing clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Was greeted with

Emphasizes the reception or welcome received.

Received

Focuses on the act of getting or being given a response.

Encountered

Direct synonym, focusing on the act of meeting or facing something.

Faced

Highlights the act of confronting a situation or challenge.

Was confronted with

Indicates a direct and often challenging encounter.

Was presented with

Suggests a formal or deliberate introduction of something.

Experienced

Highlights the personal sensation or feeling of encountering something.

Underwent

Implies a process or transformation resulting from the encounter.

Was subjected to

Indicates an involuntary or possibly unpleasant experience.

Was exposed to

Emphasizes the state of being revealed to or influenced by something.

FAQs

How can I use "was met" in a sentence?

Use "was met" to describe the reaction or response to a particular action or proposal. For instance, "The suggestion was met with silence" indicates that there was no verbal response to the suggestion.

What are some alternatives to "was met"?

You can use alternatives like "was greeted with", "encountered", or "received" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "was met with" or "met with"?

"Was met with" is the passive voice construction, appropriate when the focus is on the action or proposal and its reception. "Met with" is active and should be used when the focus is on the actor and what they encountered. For example, "The team met with resistance".

What's the difference between "was met with silence" and "was met with applause"?

"Was met with silence" indicates a lack of response, suggesting disapproval, shock, or lack of interest. "Was met with applause" signifies approval, enthusiasm, or agreement. The phrase "was met" simply indicates the type of reaction that occurred.