was long with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was long with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe a duration or a relationship, but it lacks clarity and proper context. Example: "The meeting was long with many discussions about the project timeline."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

12 human-written examples

"It was a peculiar letter, taller than it was long, with no return address.

The Guardian - Books

Roddick then passed him with a backhand and Sampras was long with another forehand.

The New York Times - Sports

The man's suit jacket was long, with a belt across the back.

The New Yorker

Her line was long, with her crinkled pleated and silk cloqué dresses flowing over the body.

The New York Times

Kuerten could not handle his next serve, but Sampras was long with a backhand to deadlock the tie breaker once again.

The New York Times - Sports

The Cavs had one last chance to tie it, but C. J. Miles was long with a 3-pointer in the final second.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

They are long, with big toes like thumbs.

The New Yorker

But the path is long, with no guarantee of success.

The New York Times

Lines at airports are long, with people still adjusting to carry-on rules for liquids.

The New York Times - Tech

Her face is long, with hyperexpressive features -- a prominent nose, persimmon lips and deep cheek creases.

The New York Times

Owens is generous with the technical explanation: "All of the sleeves are long, with a small shoulder.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, replace "was long with" with more precise phrases such as "was lengthy and included", "lasted a long time and featured", or "extended for a long duration with" to avoid ambiguity and enhance readability. Tailor the replacement to suit the specific context of your sentence.

Common error

Avoid using "was long with" to describe duration and characteristics simultaneously. This can create grammatically weak sentences. Instead, separate the duration and the characteristics into two distinct phrases for better clarity: "The process was lengthy. It also included several key steps."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was long with" functions as a descriptive connector, attempting to link a state of prolonged duration with associated characteristics. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase is not grammatically correct and lacks clarity.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

32%

Wiki

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "was long with" appears in various contexts, including News & Media and Science, it is considered grammatically incorrect, as noted by Ludwig AI. The primary issue is a lack of clarity and grammatical soundness. For clearer and more effective communication, replace "was long with" with alternatives such as "was lengthy and included" or "lasted a long time and featured". These options provide greater precision and grammatical correctness, making them preferable in both formal and informal writing. Consider the specific context to select the most appropriate replacement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was lengthy and included

Replaces "long with" to clearly express both duration and inclusion of elements.

was prolonged and contained

Focuses on extended duration and the elements it held within.

had a long duration and involved

Replaces "was long with" with 'had a long duration' and 'involved' for clarity.

lasted a long time and featured

Conveys the idea of duration and prominent elements.

was characterized by a long period of

Emphasizes the duration as a defining feature.

extended for a long duration with

Highlights both the extension of time and the concurrent inclusion of elements.

was a drawn-out period that included

Implies slowness and the presence of multiple elements.

spanned a long timeframe with

Indicates an extended period with concurrent elements.

was a long process that incorporated

Suggests an extended procedure with included steps or elements.

was of considerable length with

Highlights significant duration with concurrent elements

FAQs

How can I correctly express a long duration combined with additional details instead of using "was long with"?

Opt for clearer alternatives such as "was lengthy and included", "lasted a long time and featured", or "extended for a long duration with". These phrases provide better grammatical structure and readability.

What's wrong with saying "was long with"?

The phrase "was long with" is not grammatically sound. It is best to use a phrase like "was lengthy and included" to better convey your message.

Is there a formal way to say something "was long with" certain attributes?

In formal writing, use phrases like "was a drawn-out period that included" or "was of considerable length with" to maintain a professional tone while accurately describing a lengthy duration combined with specific attributes. This offers higher precision than the original phrase.

Can "was long with" be used in any context?

While you might encounter "was long with" in some contexts, it's generally advisable to replace it with clearer and more grammatically correct alternatives to avoid ambiguity and ensure effective communication. Consider phrases such as "had a long duration and involved".