was little changed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was little changed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or condition that has not significantly altered over time. Example: "Despite the new policies, the overall performance of the team was little changed from the previous quarter."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Volume was little changed from Wednesday's session, with 1.1 billion shares changing hands.

The Guardian - Business

Inflation was little changed.

The New York Times

Debt underwriting was little changed.

The New York Times

Revenue was little changed at $3.1 billion.

The New York Times

And the margin between them, this time, was little changed.

Independent

The dollar was little changed against other major currencies.

The New York Times

The average selling price was little changed at $570,000.

The New York Times

The dollar was little changed at ¥79.44 from ¥79.47.

The New York Times

Revenue was little changed at £5.97 billion ($11.63 billion).

The New York Times

And the market was little changed for the quarter.

The New York Times

On the week, the yield was little changed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Be mindful of the nuance that "was little changed" suggests a slight difference, whereas "was unchanged" implies no difference at all.

Common error

Avoid using "was little changed" when you intend to convey that something remained completely the same. "Was little changed" implies a slight variation, not absolute stasis. If there was absolutely no change, use phrases like "remained the same" or "was unchanged".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was little changed" functions as a descriptive expression indicating a state of minimal alteration or stability. It is commonly used to compare a current condition to a previous one, highlighting that any differences are insignificant. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

19%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was little changed" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to indicate that something has remained largely stable with minimal alteration. Ludwig AI confirms it's correct usage. Predominantly found in news and media contexts, as well as in scientific and formal business writing, the phrase serves to convey a sense of continuity and stability. While the meaning is generally clear, it's important to avoid using it to imply absolute stasis when slight variations exist. For alternatives, consider options like "remained almost the same" or "stayed relatively stable" to accurately reflect the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

remained almost the same

This alternative suggests a very slight difference, emphasizing the lack of substantial change.

stayed relatively stable

This phrase focuses on the stability of something, implying that it didn't fluctuate much.

saw minimal alteration

This option uses more formal language and highlights the small degree of alteration.

experienced no significant change

This phrase emphasizes the absence of notable change, suggesting that any variations were insignificant.

did not vary considerably

This indicates that the subject didn't change to a substantial degree.

held steady

A concise way to convey stability or lack of change, often used in financial or economic contexts.

was substantially unchanged

This stresses that any alteration was not significant or impactful.

presented little difference

This highlights the similarity between two points in time, indicating that the change was almost imperceptible.

underwent only minor modifications

This suggests that there were some changes, but they were small and didn't fundamentally alter the subject.

showed negligible variation

This implies that the fluctuations were so small that they were almost unnoticeable.

FAQs

What does "was little changed" mean?

The phrase "was little changed" means that something remained mostly the same, with only minor or insignificant alterations.

What can I say instead of "was little changed"?

You can use alternatives like "remained almost the same", "stayed relatively stable", or "experienced no significant change" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was little changed"?

Yes, "was little changed" is grammatically correct and commonly used to describe something that has undergone minimal alteration.

How do I use "was little changed" in a sentence?

You can use "was little changed" to compare a current state to a previous one, indicating that there has been some but not substantial variation. For example, "The company's market share was little changed since last quarter".