was lined with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was lined with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has a border or edge made of a particular material or substance, often to enhance appearance or provide protection. Example: "The garden path was lined with colorful flowers, creating a beautiful entrance to the home."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The stage was lined with military police.

The Guardian

Outside, the street was lined with tenements.

The New York Times

Every room was lined with books.

The Guardian

His underwear was lined with drugs.

The New York Times

It was lined with bookshelves and my parents' books.

Harvard University

It was lined with blood and splinters of bone.

The New York Times

Before that, tennis was lined with teenage champions.

The New York Times - Sports

The street was lined with television cameras, correspondents and photographers.

The New York Times

The street was lined with television vans and crews.

The New Yorker

Street after street was lined with gracious white stucco houses.

The New York Times - Books

HIS handsome face was lined with years and resentment.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was lined with" to vividly describe a space or object's boundaries or surfaces. For example, "The path was lined with cherry blossoms, creating a stunning spring vista."

Common error

Avoid using "was lined with" in abstract or metaphorical contexts where a more precise verb would be more effective. For example, instead of saying "The argument was lined with fallacies", opt for "The argument was riddled with fallacies".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was lined with" functions as a descriptive verb phrase, indicating that something had a specific arrangement or covering along its edges or surface. As Ludwig AI states, it is correct and usable in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Academia

12%

Science

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was lined with" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to vividly describe how something is bordered, edged, or covered. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. It is most frequently found in news and media contexts, and while versatile, care should be taken to avoid overuse in abstract situations where more precise vocabulary might be more impactful. By understanding its appropriate usage and exploring alternative expressions, writers can enhance their descriptive skills and avoid common pitfalls.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was bordered by

This alternative replaces the verb "lined" with "bordered", indicating a boundary or edge.

was edged with

This alternative uses "edged" instead of "lined", suggesting a narrow strip along the edge.

was covered in

This phrase emphasizes the covering aspect more than the linear arrangement.

was arrayed with

This alternative suggests a more decorative or deliberate arrangement.

was furnished with

This phrase indicates the provision of something for use, particularly in an interior space.

was decorated with

This implies an aesthetic enhancement through the addition of something.

featured

A more concise phrasing, focusing on a prominent characteristic.

had

A simple alternative expressing possession of lining.

was packed with

Describes being densely filled, not necessarily in a line.

included

This alternative suggests that the lining is part of a larger set of features.

FAQs

How can I use "was lined with" in a sentence?

Use "was lined with" to describe something that has a border or edge made of a particular material or substance. For example, "The street "was lined with trees"".

What are some alternatives to "was lined with"?

You can use alternatives like "was bordered by", "was edged with", or "was covered in" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was lined with" or "is lined with"?

The correct tense depends on the context. "Was lined with" is past tense, while "is lined with" is present tense. Use "was lined with" to describe a past state and "is lined with" for a current state.

What's the difference between "was lined with" and "was filled with"?

"Was lined with" suggests that something is arranged along the edges or surfaces, while "was filled with" means that something is full of something else. For example, "The street was lined with trees" versus "The room was filled with people".