Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
F-FDG-PET was less sensitive in detecting axillary metastases from lobular carcinoma (sensitivity 25%) than ductal carcinoma (sensitivity 66%).
Because it was organized around personalities, they argued, it was less sensitive to quality.
BIOCLIM was less sensitive to data density.
The revised RMI was less sensitive to differences.
PET/CT was less sensitive as it failed to identify a clinical responder.
The influence of site effects on wood density was less sensitive than for tree-ring width.
Nitrite reductase was less sensitive toward nCeO2 NPs increase than nitrate reductases.
The model was less sensitive to the number of moths per imported object (Figure 8C).
The compressive notch strength was less sensitive to the tensile notch strength.
The damage microstructure was less sensitive to dose than to temperature.
Mapping showed that RF was less sensitive to the training set sampling intensity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com