was lent from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was lent from" is not correct in standard English usage.
The correct expression would typically be "was borrowed from" or "was taken from." Example: "The idea was borrowed from ancient philosophy."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

Other players have been traded for themselves, including infielder John McDonald, who was lent from Toronto to Detroit for two and a half months in 2005.

The New York Times

In 1969, Mr. Beebe was lent from Ford to handle the operations of the National Alliance of Businessmen, where he was responsible for finding 100,000 jobs for the unemployed.

The New York Times

Among Americans, midfielder Michael Bradley was lent to Aston Villa from Germany's Borussia Moenchengladbach until the end of the season; forward Robbie Findley received international clearance to sign with the second-tier English club Nottingham Forest; and forward Jozy Altidore was lent from Villarreal in Spain to the defending Turkish champion, Bursaspor, for the rest of the season.

The New York Times - Sports

A series of apomorphine -1, APO -derived APO -derived, -4--6) were designed analoguesesized by hybridizing APO with a privileged 2-aminothiazole functionality which was lent from the orally available anti-parkinsonian drug, pramipexole (2).

Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry

An 1894 Roper velocipede was lent from the R. J. Boudeman family collection to the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum's 2001 expansion, Guggenheim Las Vegas, where The Art of the Motorcycle exhibition was the only show there until the expansion closed in 2003.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

The money is being lent from Palestinian banks against promises of extra assistance from Arab states.

The New York Times

Only one work in his captivating exhibition of recent work at Modern Art Oxford has been lent from a museum.

The Guardian

The museum has mounted a companion exhibition, "Wisconsin Collects Avery," which consists of 47 works from Avery's entire career that were lent from all over the state.

The New York Times - Arts

The sculpture, which celebrates this 19th-century abolitionist and suffragist, is being lent from the New-York Histheical Society at the request of the state's first lady, Michelle Page Paterson.

The New York Times

Some of the pieces are lent from Cleveland, and many, like a tape of a private Bob Dylan show in 1961, have never been exhibited before.

The New York Times - Arts

Almost 50 more Canova sculptures of female and male nudes, other portraits of sitters in classical guise, paintings, drawings and clay models have been lent from around the world.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using the phrase "was lent from", use "was borrowed from", "was taken from", or "was derived from" for clarity and grammatical accuracy. Ensure the verb accurately reflects the action of acquiring something from a source.

Common error

Avoid using "lent" when you mean something was received or taken. "Lent" implies giving, not receiving. The correct phrasing depends on whether you want to express a temporary transfer (borrowed) or a permanent acquisition (taken, derived).

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was lent from" functions as a passive construction attempting to describe the origin or source of something. However, it is grammatically incorrect because "lent" implies giving, not receiving. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as incorrect.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was lent from" is grammatically incorrect, as pointed out by Ludwig AI. The verb "lent" implies giving something to someone, not receiving it. The analysis of the provided data shows that while the phrase appears in various contexts, including news, science, and wiki sources, its usage is infrequent and should be avoided. Instead, consider using alternatives like "was borrowed from", "was taken from", or "was derived from" to accurately convey the intended meaning. These alternatives clearly express that something was received or obtained from a particular source.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was borrowed from

Replaces "lent" with "borrowed" to indicate a temporary acquisition, correcting the verb choice.

was taken from

Uses "taken" instead of "lent" to express removal or derivation from a source.

was obtained from

Employs "obtained" to signify gaining something from a specific origin.

was derived from

Indicates that something originated or came from a particular source.

was sourced from

Highlights the origin or source from which something was acquired.

was acquired from

Focuses on the act of acquiring something from a specific place or entity.

was adapted from

Suggests that something was modified or changed from an original source.

was inspired by

Indicates that something was influenced or motivated by a source.

was influenced by

Expresses that a source had an effect on the development or nature of something.

was extracted from

Implies that something was carefully or forcefully removed or obtained from a source.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say something came from somewhere?

Instead of using the grammatically incorrect phrase "was lent from", use phrases like "was borrowed from", "was taken from", or "was derived from" to accurately describe the origin of something.

Is "was lent from" grammatically correct?

No, "was lent from" is not grammatically correct. The verb "lent" means to give something temporarily. To indicate that something was received from somewhere, use "was borrowed from" or "was taken from".

What can I use instead of "was lent from" to describe the origin of an idea?

To describe the origin of an idea, you can use phrases like "was inspired by", "was derived from", or "was sourced from" instead of the incorrect "was lent from".

How does the meaning change when using "was borrowed from" instead of "was lent from"?

Using "was borrowed from" indicates a temporary acquisition, implying that the item will be returned. "Was lent from" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't convey a clear meaning, as "lent" implies giving, not receiving.