was largely ignored

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was largely ignored" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where something was not given much attention or consideration by a significant number of people. Example: "The proposal for the new policy was largely ignored by the committee during their discussions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was largely ignored.

The New Yorker

The edict was largely ignored.

The New Yorker

The report was largely ignored.

The Economist

Claxton's speech was largely ignored.

The New Yorker

The law was largely ignored.

Independent

What happened to Iraqis was largely ignored.

The New York Times

The Beecroft report was largely ignored.

The Guardian - Opinion

For a decade Afghanistan was largely ignored.

The Guardian - Opinion

But the report was largely ignored.

The New York Times

The 1991 film adaptation, however, was largely ignored.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

They have been largely ignored.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was largely ignored" when you want to emphasize that something did not receive the attention it potentially deserved. This can be particularly effective when highlighting missed opportunities or undervalued contributions.

Common error

Avoid using "was largely ignored" if there's evidence of some attention or acknowledgment. Instead, consider using phrases like "received limited attention" or "was not widely adopted" to more accurately reflect the situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was largely ignored" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence did not receive significant attention or consideration. According to Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and usable in written English. The examples illustrate how different reports, suggestions, or even entire groups of people can be "was largely ignored".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

77%

Encyclopedias

8%

Science

7%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Academia

2%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was largely ignored" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to describe something that didn't receive due attention. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts, predominantly appearing in News & Media. Alternatives like "went unnoticed" or "was mostly overlooked" can be used for variety. When employing this phrase, ensure it accurately reflects the level of neglect and avoids overstatement. Its neutral register makes it appropriate for diverse writing styles, emphasizing its versatility and correctness in the English language.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

went unnoticed

Indicates a lack of observation or recognition.

was mostly overlooked

Suggests something was missed or not given sufficient attention.

received little attention

Emphasizes the lack of focus or notice.

was disregarded

Highlights a deliberate act of ignoring or dismissing something.

was given short shrift

Implies that something was dealt with quickly and without much care.

was marginalized

Suggests that something was pushed to the side and treated as unimportant.

failed to gain traction

Indicates a lack of progress or acceptance.

was set aside

Suggests a deliberate act of putting something aside, often without intention of revisiting it.

was brushed aside

Indicates that something was dismissed or treated as unimportant.

attracted minimal interest

Emphasizes the lack of engagement or enthusiasm.

FAQs

What does "was largely ignored" mean?

It means something was mostly overlooked or did not receive the attention it might have warranted. It suggests a significant lack of consideration or acknowledgment.

What can I say instead of "was largely ignored"?

You can use alternatives like "went unnoticed", "was mostly overlooked", or "received little attention" depending on the context.

Is "was largely ignored" grammatically correct?

Yes, "was largely ignored" is grammatically correct. It uses the passive voice and follows standard English grammar rules.

In what contexts is "was largely ignored" most appropriate?

The phrase "was largely ignored" is appropriate in contexts where you want to convey that something, such as a report or suggestion, did not receive significant attention or consideration. It's common in news, academic writing, and general discourse.