was labeled

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was labeled" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was marked or identified in a specific way in the past. Example: "The package was labeled as fragile to ensure careful handling during shipping."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

It was labeled "Vision".

The New Yorker

I was labeled rude.

The New York Times

Instead I was labeled "petite".

The New York Times - Health

It was labeled "manmade silk".

The New York Times

"I was labeled a troublemaker".

The New York Times - Books

It was labeled Blitum foliosum.

The New York Times

(One page was labeled "Cop Notes").

The New York Times

The shipment was labeled floor tiles.

The New York Times

The biggest one was labeled "Power".

The New York Times

The tilted chair was labeled "Reality".

The New Yorker

For this I was labeled "shrill".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was labeled" when you want to indicate that something or someone was given a specific designation or classification. It's suitable for both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "is labeled" when referring to a past event. Use "was labeled" to maintain grammatical correctness when describing something that happened in the past.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was labeled" functions as a passive verb construction. It indicates that the subject of the sentence received a label or designation from an external actor. Ludwig's examples showcase its usage across various domains, indicating widespread acceptability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Science

37%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was labeled" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that something received a specific designation or classification in the past. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is widely accepted and used across diverse contexts, particularly in News & Media and Science. While various alternatives exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Ensure correct tense usage and context-appropriate application to maintain clarity and grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was identified as

Focuses on the act of identification, implying a discovery or recognition.

was classified as

Emphasizes categorization into a specific group or class.

was designated as

Suggests a formal assignment of a label or title.

was tagged as

Similar to "was labeled" but often used in more informal contexts.

was named

Simple and direct, referring to the act of giving a name or label.

was referred to as

Indicates a common or accepted way of addressing something.

was marked as

Emphasizes the physical or symbolic marking of something.

was characterized as

Focuses on describing the qualities or nature of something.

was known as

Indicates a well-established or widely recognized name or title.

was branded as

Often implies a negative or marketing-driven connotation.

FAQs

How to use "was labeled" in a sentence?

"Was labeled" indicates a past action of assigning a label. For example, "The shipment "was labeled fragile" to ensure careful handling."

What can I say instead of "was labeled"?

You can use alternatives like "was identified as", "was classified as", or "was designated as" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was labeled" or "is labeled"?

"Was labeled" is used for past events, while "is labeled" is for present situations. For instance, "The product "was labeled yesterday"" versus "The product "is labeled now"".

What's the difference between "was labeled" and "was considered"?

"Was labeled" implies a specific designation or classification, whereas "was considered" indicates an opinion or judgment. For example, "The item "was labeled defective"" means it received that specific designation, while "The item "was considered defective"" means it was viewed as such.