was just as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was just as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to compare two things or situations, indicating that they are equal in some way. Example: "Her performance in the second act was just as impressive as in the first."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was just as well.

The New Yorker

The weather was just as confused.

The New Yorker

The White House was just as blunt.

The New York Times

Maybe it was just as well.

The New York Times

But that was just as well.

The New Yorker

The food situation was just as bad.

The New York Times

He was just as fresh".

The New York Times - Magazine

That was just as bad.

The Guardian

The mayor, Karen Tingle-Sames, was just as optimistic.

The New York Times

The last out was just as strange.

The New York Times - Sports

The American delegation was just as positive.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was just as" to create a balanced comparison between two elements, ensuring clarity and emphasis on their shared qualities or characteristics.

Common error

Avoid using "was just as" when the comparison is not valid or the elements being compared are significantly different in nature or scale. For example, don't say "His attempt at singing was just as successful as winning the lottery" because one requires skill while the other is pure chance.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was just as" functions as a comparative conjunction, indicating that two subjects or situations share a similar degree of a particular attribute. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage for equivalence. Examples show it being used to equate the intensity, quality, or state of different things.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

89%

Science

6%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was just as" is a commonly used comparative conjunction that indicates a similar degree of an attribute between two subjects or situations. Ludwig AI confirms its accurate and frequent usage, particularly in News & Media. It serves to establish a comparison, emphasize similarities, and provide context. While versatile across registers, it is best suited for neutral communication. Alternatives such as "was equally" or "was identical" can be used for slight variations in emphasis. Avoid using it in invalid or illogical comparisons to maintain clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was equally

Replaces "just as" with "equally", emphasizing identical degree.

was as much

Emphasizes quantity or degree, indicating the same amount or intensity.

was identical

Indicates a complete match or equivalence between two things.

was similar

Suggests a resemblance without necessarily implying complete equality.

mirrored

Implies a direct correspondence or reflection of something.

resembled

Indicates a likeness or similarity in appearance or nature.

was of the same

Highlights that two things share the same attribute or characteristic.

matched

Indicates that two things correspond or are equal in some way.

was like

A more informal way of indicating similarity or resemblance.

equaled

Indicates that two things are equivalent in value or amount.

FAQs

How can I use "was just as" in a sentence?

Use "was just as" to compare two things or situations, indicating they are equal in some aspect. For example, "The sequel was just as exciting as the original movie".

What phrases are similar to "was just as"?

You can use alternatives such as "was equally", "was as much", or "was identical" depending on the specific context.

Is it always necessary to explicitly state what is being compared when using "was just as"?

While not always mandatory, explicitly stating what's being compared provides clarity and prevents ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "The experience was just as fulfilling", specify "The experience was just as fulfilling as his previous volunteer work".

When is it inappropriate to use "was just as"?

Avoid using "was just as" when comparing items that are fundamentally different or when the comparison is illogical. For example, "The weather was just as blue as the ocean" doesn't make sense because weather and the ocean are being compared with an unrelated attribute.