was joint with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was joint with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is likely intended to convey a partnership or collaboration, but the correct form would be "was joined with" or "was in joint with." Example: "The project was joined with several other initiatives to maximize its impact."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

McIlroy: Even better and younger than Woods in 2000 6 McIlroy's six-shot lead at halfway was joint with Woods' 36-hole advantage in 2000 as the largest of all time.

Independent

GPK&AR trains used the Glasgow and Paisley Joint Line as far as Paisley; it was joint with the Glasgow, Paisley and Greenock Railway.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

These features are joint with the functionals of LLD by concatenation.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

The solving process is joint with core model, while the core model is air-gapped, air-gapped CT model is got, otherwise closed-core CT model is established.

Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems

Physical custody can be joint, with the child rotating weeks or months living with each parent.

WikiHow

The Newham primary school pupil was joint second with 5/6 in the Amateur.

The Guardian - Sport

He was joint winner (with his father, Sir William Bragg) of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1915.

Encyclopedia Britannica

And he was joint favourite with Julian Barnes at the longlist stage to take home the gong for the second time.

The Guardian - Books

Webster was joint deputy editor with Simon Cosyns.

The Guardian

Arsenal are joint second with eight.

Independent

England are joint fourth with Sri Lanka.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "was joint with" in formal writing. Opt for more grammatically sound alternatives such as "was partnered with" or "was combined with" to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Common error

The word "joint" often implies shared ownership or participation. However, using "was joint with" incorrectly suggests that something was physically connected to something else rather than in a collaborative state. Refrain from using "joint" in this context unless you mean physical connection.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was joint with" aims to express a collaborative or shared relationship. However, it's grammatically unconventional. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not correct in standard written English, suggesting alternative phrasing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was joint with" is grammatically flawed and infrequently used. Ludwig AI confirms this, recommending alternatives like "was partnered with" or "was combined with" for better clarity and accuracy. While the phrase appears across various contexts including News & Media, Wiki and Science, it is advisable to use more conventional phrasing, particularly in professional and academic writing. Opting for alternatives will enhance clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was partnered with

Indicates a formal agreement or collaboration between two entities.

was combined with

Suggests that two or more things were merged or united.

was in partnership with

Emphasizes a collaborative business relationship.

was in collaboration with

Highlights a cooperative effort towards a common goal.

was associated with

Indicates a connection or link between two things.

was working alongside

Suggests a cooperative effort happening simultaneously.

was in conjunction with

Emphasizes that something happened alongside or simultaneously with something else.

was allied with

Implies a formal alliance or agreement for mutual support.

was interconnected with

Highlights the interdependence or mutual influence between entities.

shared with

Indicates that something was mutually possessed or experienced.

FAQs

What are some correct alternatives to "was joint with"?

Instead of "was joint with", consider using phrases like "was partnered with", "was combined with", or "was in collaboration with" depending on the intended meaning.

Is "was joint with" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "was joint with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It's better to use alternatives like "was partnered with" or "was in partnership with".

How can I use "partnered" correctly in a sentence?

You can say something like, "The company was partnered with a local charity to support community initiatives."

What is the difference between "was joint with" and "was joined with"?

"Was joint with" is generally incorrect. "Was joined with" implies that something was connected or united with something else, such as "The pipe "was joined with" another section to extend its length."