Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was joined to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was joined to" is a correct phrase and can be used in written English.
Example: The electric wire was joined to the outlet, causing the light to turn on.

✓ Grammatically correct

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Wales was joined to England in the mid-16th century, nearly 200 years before Scotland was.

News & Media

The Economist

The sunroom was formed when an old outhouse was joined to the main house.

News & Media

The New York Times

There the project was joined to a line of the Grand Trunk.

At this time Africa was joined to South America, Eurasia, and North America.

It was joined to Nova Scotia but in 1784 became a separate British crown colony.

That suit was joined to a civil rights lawsuit filed the same year by the Justice Department.

News & Media

The New York Times

For five years (1936 41) Ethiopia was joined to Eritrea and Italian Somaliland to form Italian East Africa.

It was joined to the Kingdom of Sardinia in 1815 and to that of Italy in 1861.

In the northeast, Africa was joined to Asia by the Sinai Peninsula until the construction of the Suez Canal.

Incorporated in the duchy of Lorraine in the 15th century, it was joined to France in 1766.

In 18th-century theory the doctrine of imitation was joined to numerous strictures on "smoothness," or metrical regularity.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was joined to", ensure the context clearly indicates what elements are being connected and the nature of their connection.

Common error

Avoid using "was joined to" when an active voice construction would be clearer and more direct. For example, instead of "The wire was joined to the device by the technician", consider "The technician joined the wire to the device".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was joined to" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject underwent the action of being connected or linked to something else. Ludwig examples show its use across various domains, affirming its validity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Encyclopedias

31%

Science

25%

News & Media

22%

Less common in

Wiki

9%

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was joined to" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive verb phrase that denotes a connection or union between two entities. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. Its usage spans various domains, from historical accounts in encyclopedias to scientific explanations and news reports, with a generally neutral to formal register. When writing, ensure the context clearly indicates the connected elements and the nature of their connection. Alternatives such as "was connected to" or "was linked to" can be used depending on the desired nuance.

FAQs

How can I use "was joined to" in a sentence?

The phrase "was joined to" indicates that two or more things were connected or combined. For example, "The island was joined to the mainland by a bridge" or "The two companies were joined to form a larger corporation".

What are some alternatives to "was joined to"?

Alternatives include "was connected to", "was linked to", or "was merged with", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to use "was joined to" or "joined with"?

"Was joined to" is passive and describes a state or result, while "joined with" (or simply "joined") is active and emphasizes the action. The best choice depends on whether you want to focus on the connection itself or the act of connecting.

What's the difference between "was joined to" and "was attached to"?

"Was joined to" often implies a more integrated or permanent connection, whereas "was attached to" suggests a connection that may be less permanent or more superficial.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: