Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was it targeted
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was it targeted" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when inquiring whether something was specifically aimed at a particular person, group, or objective. Example: "In the investigation, we need to determine if the attack was it targeted or random."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Not only was it targeted, but Flood Wall Street was also BIG, demonstrating that ever more people are setting their sites on the root of the problem, not distracted by shiny baubles like "100percentt renewable energy" or "go vegan" or promises of miraculous new technofixes like climate geoengineering designed to perpetuate business as usual.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
"What this measure does is it targets poor drinkers".
News & Media
We know the U.S. isn't targeting only al Qaeda leaders; so who is it targeting?
News & Media
Was it a Target?
News & Media
"It's personalized, it's targeted and it works with lightning speed".
News & Media
When it's targeted, like his was, it projects strength.
News & Media
It is to be targeted mainly at the nightclub market.
News & Media
This effort is unprecedented, it is coordinated, and it is targeted.
News & Media
When CENP-I is extensively SUMOylated, it is targeted for degradation.
Science
If it's poorly targeted, it will piss someone off.
News & Media
It was targeted public funding of athletes and infrastructure," Barber added.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was it targeted", ensure the context clearly identifies what "it" refers to. Ambiguity can confuse the meaning of your sentence.
Common error
Avoid using "was it targeted" without specifying the intended target. Ensure your sentence clearly indicates who or what the targeting was directed at to avoid misinterpretations.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was it targeted" functions as an interrogative clause, used to question whether something was intentionally directed towards a specific goal, person, or object. It seeks to determine if there was a deliberate aim or focus behind an action or event. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is grammatically correct.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
25%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was it targeted" is a grammatically sound interrogative used to question the intentionality behind an action or event. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is correct and usable in English. While its usage is relatively rare, it commonly appears in news and media contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity regarding what "it" refers to and what the intended target was. Alternatives such as "was it intentional" or "was it deliberate" can be used for a more formal tone, depending on the context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was it intentional
Emphasizes the intent behind the action, focusing on whether the action was deliberate rather than accidental.
was it deliberate
Focuses on whether the action was planned or premeditated, highlighting the conscious decision-making process.
was it aimed at
Directly questions the target or recipient of the action, specifying who or what was intended to be affected.
did it single out
Suggests the action specifically selected or isolated someone or something from a larger group.
was it directed toward
Indicates the action's trajectory or intended recipient, similar to 'aimed at' but slightly more formal.
did it focus on
Emphasizes the concentration or emphasis of the action on a particular subject or area.
did it have a specific target
Directly questions whether there was a pre-determined objective or recipient of the action.
was it meant for
Focuses on the intended purpose or recipient of the action, highlighting the design or plan behind it.
was it pinpointed
Implies a high degree of accuracy or precision in selecting the recipient or objective of the action.
was there a target
Inquires whether the action had a specific objective in mind.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "was it targeted" to sound more formal?
You could use phrases such as "was it intentional" or "was it deliberate" depending on the context. These options offer a more formal tone.
What's the difference between "was it targeted" and "was it aimed at"?
"Was it targeted" generally refers to the overall intent or objective, while "was it aimed at" is more specific about the direction or recipient of the action. For instance, you might ask if a marketing campaign "was it targeted" at millennials, or "was it aimed at" a specific demographic group.
Can I use "was it targeted" in a negative context?
Yes, you can use it to question whether something was unfairly or inappropriately targeted. For example, "Was it targeted at minority groups?" implies a concern about potential discrimination.
What are some common synonyms for "targeted" in the phrase "was it targeted"?
Common synonyms include "aimed at", "directed toward", or "focused on". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested