Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Why was it omitted?
Similar(59)
Sometimes it is what is omitted rather than what is included that is the most telling.
Since the proof is similar, it is omitted.
Since the proof is standard, it is omitted (see Proposition 3.11 in [50]).
Since the proof is standard, it is omitted (see, Proposition 3.11 in [3]).
Thus there are problems if the requirement is kept, and there are problems if it is omitted.
The word "Restoration" is highlighted, because too often it is omitted and it defines the purpose.
It is omitted since it can be deduced similarly, starting from Corollary 5.2.
The proof of (b) is similar, hence it is omitted.
The proof is elementary and it is omitted here.
The opposite direction is obvious, so it is omitted.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com