was invalidated by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was invalidated by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where a decision, action, or document has been rendered void or nullified by a specific authority or event. Example: "The contract was invalidated by the court due to a breach of terms."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

Mr Anwar says the agreement was invalidated by government cheating at the polls.

The Economist

Mr. Korematsu's conviction was invalidated by a federal judge in 1984 on factual grounds.

The New York Times

The company faced a setback in 2007, when its patent for cryogenic encapsulation was invalidated by a federal court jury.

The New York Times

In 2000, it was invalidated by the United States Supreme Court after a challenge from several political parties.

The New York Times

The rule proposed by the Obama administration was invalidated by a Texas judge weeks before it was scheduled to go into effect.

The Washington Post

The NRA ended when it was invalidated by the Supreme Court in 1935, but many of its provisions were included in subsequent legislation.

Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

But not all such uses are invalidated by strict scrutiny.

Cornell University

Any other decision would have been invalidated by a court.

The Guardian

We can be invalidated by events such as the bankruptcy of the firm that employs us, but most frequently we are invalidated by other people.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Statistical analyses that appear to be perfectly successful can be invalidated by concealed numerical problems.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Most of the old coded provisions have been invalidated by the courts".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was invalidated by", ensure the reason for invalidation is clearly stated to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example: "The contract was invalidated by a breach of terms."

Common error

While "was invalidated by" is grammatically correct, excessive use of passive voice can make writing sound weak or unclear. Consider rewriting the sentence in active voice if appropriate. For example, instead of "The decision was invalidated by the court", try "The court invalidated the decision".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was invalidated by" functions as a passive construction indicating that a prior action, decision, or rule has been rendered void or ineffective due to a specific cause or event. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

22%

Encyclopedias

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

6%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was invalidated by" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive construction to express that something has been rendered void or ineffective. As Ludwig AI explains, it is mainly used in News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias, indicating a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, clarity and context are essential. While correct, be mindful of overusing passive voice. Related phrases include "was nullified by", "was overturned by", and "was rendered void by", each with slight nuances in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was nullified by

Emphasis on the act of making something legally void or ineffective.

was overturned by

Specifically implies a reversal of a decision or ruling, often in a legal context.

was voided by

Focuses on the cancellation or annulment of something, often a contract or agreement.

was rendered void by

Similar to "was voided by" but emphasizes the process or state of becoming invalid.

was superseded by

Indicates replacement by something newer or more effective.

was negated by

Highlights the act of canceling out or counteracting something.

was repealed by

Specifically refers to the revocation or annulment of a law or statute.

was rescinded by

Implies the cancellation of an action or agreement.

was annulled by

Often used in legal or formal contexts to indicate the invalidation of a marriage, law, or contract.

was discredited by

Focuses on the loss of credibility or reputation as a result of new information or events.

FAQs

How can I use "was invalidated by" in a sentence?

Use "was invalidated by" to indicate that something has been rendered void or ineffective due to a specific cause or event. For example, "The election results "were invalidated by" evidence of voter fraud."

What are some alternatives to "was invalidated by"?

You can use alternatives like "was nullified by", "was overturned by", or "was rendered void by" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "invalidate"?

While "was invalidated by" is grammatically correct in passive voice, using active voice can sometimes make the sentence more direct and clear. For example, instead of "The law was invalidated by the court", you could say "The court invalidated the law".

What's the difference between "was invalidated by" and "was superseded by"?

"Was invalidated by" means something has been rendered void or ineffective, while "was superseded by" means something has been replaced by something else. Invalidated means it's no longer valid, superseded means it's been replaced.