was interrogated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was interrogated with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used to describe a situation where someone was questioned, but the preposition "with" is not appropriate in this context. Example: "The suspect was interrogated by the police for several hours."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

In Bahawalpur, as elsewhere in Pakistan, I was interrogated with polite determination.

The Guardian - Sport

Selectivity was interrogated with l-DOPA which gave a flat response of Au-MIP.

Electrochimica Acta

The sheep genome database was interrogated with ISGC BLAST using the most current assembly.

Plosone

GH680 was next immobilized on polystyrene microbeads and was interrogated with fluorescein (FITC) labeled IQ-tag displaying phage.

Plosone

The basal transcriptional dataset (CMP versus control) was interrogated with terms that would potentially reveal a neurotrophin-based or age-related bias in the CMP-mediated transcriptome set.

Plosone

The surface was interrogated with a biotinylated TF or Tn ligand.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

More than 2,500 people were interrogated, with more than 500 arrests for immigration violations like overstaying visas.

The New York Times

The movie was "Diner," and it included a scene where a bride-to-be is interrogated with laughably difficult trivia questions about the Colts.

The New York Times - Sports

It's a 24 where suspects can be interrogated with a childhood anecdote and not a direct gunshot to the kneecap of their newborn baby.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

In February this year Goldsmith told Newsnight that "every single application that crosses the mayor's desk should be interrogated with a really robust approach to ensure we get the maximum possible amount of affordability out of it".

The Guardian

FOR the first time, George Bush has acknowledged the existence of secret CIA prisons around the world, where key terrorist suspects 100 in all, officials say have been interrogated with "an alternative set of procedures".

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "was interrogated with" in formal writing. Opt for more precise and grammatically sound alternatives like "was questioned using" or "was examined via".

Common error

The verb "interrogate" typically takes a direct object (the person being questioned) or is followed by prepositions like 'by' (the interrogator) or 'about' (the subject). Avoid using "with" to describe the method or tool used during interrogation; instead, use 'using' or 'through'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was interrogated with" functions as a passive construction, describing the action of questioning or examining something. However, Ludwig AI notes that the use of "with" in this context is not considered standard English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

76%

News & Media

24%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "was interrogated with" appears in various sources, it is generally considered grammatically "incorrect" according to Ludwig AI. It is more appropriate to use alternatives like "was questioned using" or "was examined via", depending on the intended meaning. The phrase is used in both scientific and news contexts, but writers should exercise caution and opt for clearer, more standard phrasing to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was questioned using

Replaces "interrogated" with a more direct synonym and specifies the method of questioning.

was examined via

Uses "examined" to broaden the meaning beyond questioning, and "via" to indicate the means of examination.

was investigated through

Substitutes "interrogated" with "investigated", implying a more formal inquiry.

was assessed with

Uses "assessed" implying an evaluation or judgment made through a specific method.

was subjected to

Emphasizes the process of being put through a certain method of scrutiny or questioning.

was scrutinized using

Replaces "interrogated" with "scrutinized", which implies a very careful and critical examination.

was tested via

Implies a formal test or experiment was conducted to gather information.

was explored employing

Replaces "interrogated" with "explored", suggesting a detailed examination.

was probed utilizing

Utilizes "probed" to imply a deep and thorough examination, often seeking hidden information.

was analyzed by means of

Focuses on the analysis aspect, indicating a systematic examination of something.

FAQs

Is "was interrogated with" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "was interrogated with" is generally considered grammatically "incorrect" in standard English. More appropriate alternatives include "was questioned using" or "was examined by".

What are some alternatives to "was interrogated with"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "was questioned using", "was examined via", or "was investigated through".

How can I use the word "interrogated" correctly in a sentence?

Use "interrogated" with a direct object (e.g., "The suspect was interrogated by the police") or with prepositions like 'by' (e.g., "He was interrogated by the detectives") or 'about' (e.g., "She was interrogated about the incident").

What's the difference between "was interrogated by" and "was interrogated with"?

"Was interrogated by" indicates who is doing the questioning (e.g., "The witness was interrogated by the lawyer"), while "was interrogated with" is generally considered grammatically "incorrect". You might instead say the suspect was questioned using specific techniques or tools.