was increased with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was increased with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to indicate that something was augmented or made larger by a certain factor or element. Example: "The budget was increased with additional funding from the government."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Science & Research

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The protective effect of MeOH was increased with increasing concentrations.

Cryobiology

Adsorption of iBu was increased with an increase in temperature.

Chemical Engineering Journal

ADMA levels were decreased and IR was increased with treatment.

Atherosclerosis

It was increased with increases in cementitious materials contents.

Construction and Building Materials

The size of polycrystallites was increased with precursor concentration.

Journal of Alloys and Compounds

The partitioning was increased with increasing length of the peptides.

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

Also, resistivity was increased with increasing of substrate temperature.

Surface and Coatings Technology

Usually, combustion efficiency was increased with burning temperature.

Combustion and Flame

Also, photocatalytic efficiency was increased with initial solute concentration decrease.

Catalysis Today

The POD signal was increased with the Tyramin Cy5 amplification kit (PerkinElmer, 1 100).

Nature

The amount of muscle mitochondria was increased with the low dose and standard dose (Fig. 2G).

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing an increase, use "was increased by" to specify the amount or factor of the increase, such as "The budget was increased by 10%". This is clearer and grammatically sound.

Common error

Avoid using "with" to indicate the increment of increase. Saying "was increased with" is grammatically incorrect; instead, use "was increased by" to correctly specify the amount or factor of increase.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was increased with" functions as part of a passive construction, where an unspecified subject causes an increase in something. However, as Ludwig AI highlights, it's often used incorrectly and should be replaced with grammatically correct alternatives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

Science & Research

30%

News & Media

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "was increased with" appears frequently across diverse sources, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically incorrect. A more appropriate phrasing is "was increased by", which precisely specifies the increment or factor of the increase. When writing, consider alternatives like "augmented by" or "enhanced by" depending on the context. Although the phrase's intention is generally clear, its widespread misuse necessitates careful attention to ensure grammatical accuracy in professional and academic writing. Always prioritize correctness over common usage when clarity and precision are paramount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was increased by

This alternative replaces 'with' to indicate a specific increment or factor of increase.

was augmented by

This option uses 'augmented' to imply that something was enhanced or supplemented, rather than directly increased.

increased as a result of

This option highlights that the increase occurred because of something else.

was enhanced by

This uses 'enhanced' to indicate that something was improved or made better, leading to an increase.

was boosted by

Using 'boosted' suggests an increase that resulted from a supportive or empowering factor.

was amplified by

This suggests the increase was made larger or more intense by a particular element.

was elevated by

This alternative implies raising something to a higher level due to an influencing factor.

saw an increase due to

This phrase shifts the focus to observe an increase, attributing it to a specific cause.

experienced a rise because of

Similar to the previous alternative, this describes the experience of an increase linked to a particular reason.

grew in response to

This describes a growth or increase that directly answers a preceding condition or stimulus.

FAQs

What is the correct way to phrase an increase?

The correct phrasing is "was increased by", which specifies the amount or factor of the increase. Using "was increased with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect.

Can I use a different word than 'increased'?

Yes, depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "augmented", "boosted", or "enhanced". These words convey a similar meaning but may be more appropriate in certain situations.

Is "was increased with" ever correct?

While commonly used, "was increased with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in formal writing. It's better to use "was increased by" to denote the increment or cause of the increase.

What's the difference between "was increased by" and "was increased with"?

"Was increased by" is the grammatically correct phrase to indicate the amount or factor of increase (e.g., "The budget was increased by 10%"). "Was increased with" is often used incorrectly and should be avoided in formal writing.