Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was incorrectly inputted into
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was incorrectly inputted into" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a situation where data or information has been entered incorrectly into a system or database. Example: "The data was incorrectly inputted into the database, leading to several errors in the report."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
First, the summary effect (standard error [SE]) for the short-term outcome in Hofmann (2004) was incorrectly inputted as −0.28 (0.26).
Science
"A satisfactory agreement has been made with ND-C following an issue with his Virgin Active membership being incorrectly input on our system at point of sale," it said.
News & Media
British gunnery was less effective; the range was incorrectly estimated as the German ships blended into the haze.
Wiki
Erratum: "Mufasa" was incorrectly spelled as "Musafa".
"Stroke" was incorrectly defined by 40% of respondents.
Bazaarvoice was incorrectly labeled as "Bizarre Voice".
News & Media
The number of bridesmaids was incorrectly reported.
News & Media
HOEPPMER: No, that was incorrectly expressed.
Academia
Unfortunately, the bill was incorrectly written.
She was incorrectly identified.
News & Media
No diagnosis was incorrectly changed.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was incorrectly inputted into", ensure the context clearly identifies the source and nature of the error. Specify what "was" inputted and where it "was inputted into".
Common error
Avoid overuse of passive voice. Instead of "the data was incorrectly inputted into the system", consider "someone incorrectly inputted the data into the system" to highlight the actor and make the sentence more direct.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was incorrectly inputted into" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something received incorrect data during the entry process. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, albeit with limited examples.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was incorrectly inputted into" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe an error during data entry. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, though its usage is relatively rare. It appears most frequently in scientific and news contexts, suggesting a formal to neutral register. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what data and where it was inputted. Consider more common alternatives like "was incorrectly entered" to enhance readability. Be mindful of passive voice and aim for directness when appropriate. Due to it's scarcity, use it with caution and consider more frequent alternatives.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was erroneously entered into
Replaces "incorrectly inputted" with "erroneously entered", emphasizing the mistake in entry.
was wrongly entered into
Substitutes "incorrectly inputted" with "wrongly entered", a more straightforward synonym.
was improperly entered into
Replaces "incorrectly inputted" with "improperly entered", suggesting a violation of proper procedure.
was mistakenly entered into
Substitutes "incorrectly inputted" with "mistakenly entered", highlighting the unintentional nature of the error.
was incorrectly recorded in
Shifts the focus to recording rather than input, while maintaining the incorrectness.
was erroneously recorded in
Combines the idea of recording with the notion of error.
was wrongly registered in
Changes "inputted" to "registered" to suggest a formal recording error.
was incorrectly logged in
Uses "logged" instead of "inputted", implying a system entry error.
was flawed when inputted into
Focuses on the flawed nature of the data during input.
had incorrect data entered into
Rephrases the sentence to emphasize the incorrect data rather than the action of inputting.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "was incorrectly inputted into" to be more concise?
Consider using phrases like "was wrongly entered", "was mistakenly input", or "was incorrectly entered" to shorten the sentence while retaining the meaning.
What is the difference between "was incorrectly inputted into" and "was incorrectly entered into"?
The difference is minimal. Both convey the same meaning, but "was incorrectly entered into" is slightly more common and may sound more natural to some. "Inputted" is a valid but less frequently used past participle of "input".
Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing data entry errors?
It depends on the context. Passive voice (e.g. "was incorrectly inputted into") emphasizes the data and the error. Active voice (e.g. "someone incorrectly inputted") emphasizes the person who made the error. Choose the voice that best suits your message.
What are some formal alternatives to "was incorrectly inputted into"?
In formal contexts, consider phrases like "was erroneously entered into", "was improperly recorded in", or "contained incorrect data upon entry" to convey a more professional tone.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested