was in the range of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was in the range of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a particular value or measurement falls within a specified interval or limit. Example: "The temperature yesterday was in the range of 60 to 70 degrees Fahrenheit."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Percentage recovery was in the range of 96 109%.

Analytica Chimica Acta

Their size was in the range of 160 250 nm.

Journal of Controlled Release

Repeatability (n = 5) was in the range of 4.5 8.3%.

Journal of Chromatography A

The MMAD was in the range of 4 6 μm.

Powder Technology

The hardness was in the range of 9 13 GPa.

Surface and Coatings Technology

The original pre-Kmart forecast was in the range of $3.22 to $3.29.

The New York Times

The original forecast was in the range of $3.22 to $3.29.

The New York Times

Conveniently, the time they came up with was in the range of Phelps's speed.

The New York Times - Sports

Therefore, the improvement in kcat/Km was in the range of 2 4-fold.

Nature

Studio officials said its budget was in the range of $20 million to $30 million.

The New York Times

The snow accumulation across the area was in the range of 3-6".

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was in the range of" to clearly define the upper and lower limits of a measurement or value when precision is important. For instance, "The experimental temperature was in the range of 20°C to 25°C."

Common error

Avoid mixing units within the range. For example, instead of "The distance was in the range of 1 mile to 5000 feet", convert to a single unit: "The distance was in the range of 1 mile to approximately 0.95 miles."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was in the range of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating that a particular measurement or value falls within a specified interval. As Ludwig AI indicates, this construction is grammatically correct and widely accepted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

76%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Social Media

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was in the range of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for indicating that a value falls within a specified interval. As Ludwig AI confirms, its primary function is to provide clear boundaries for measurements, often found in scientific and technical writing, but applicable across various domains. When using this phrase, ensure clarity and consistency in units. Alternatives like "ranged between" or "fell between" offer more concise options. Its prevalence in science-related sources underscores its utility in technical discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fell between

Replaces the phrase with a more concise way of expressing the interval.

ranged between

A more succinct way to express that something falls within a particular range.

lay between

Conveys that a value is situated within two specified points.

varied from

Indicates the extent of variation, focusing on the difference between values.

extended from

Highlights the span from a lower to an upper limit.

spanned from

Similar to "extended from", emphasizes the coverage of an interval.

fluctuated between

Implies oscillation between two values.

oscillated between

Similar to "fluctuated between", suggests a periodic variation.

was anywhere from

Indicates the possible values that something could be.

was within the bounds of

Emphasizes the limitations or boundaries of a value.

FAQs

How can I use "was in the range of" in a sentence?

You can use "was in the range of" to specify that a particular value or measurement falls within a certain interval. For example, "The test scores was in the range of 70 to 90".

What are some alternatives to "was in the range of"?

You can use alternatives like "fell between", "varied from", or "ranged between" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was in the range of" or should I use "ranged between"?

Both "was in the range of" and "ranged between" are correct, but "ranged between" is more concise. The best choice depends on the desired level of formality and detail.

What's the difference between "was in the range of" and "was approximately"?

"Was in the range of" specifies a definite interval, while "was approximately" indicates an estimated value without precise boundaries. For example, "The height was in the range of 5 to 6 feet" provides more specific limits than "The height was approximately 5.5 feet".