Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was in a position to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was in a position to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate someone's capability or opportunity to do something in a specific context. Example: "After years of hard work, she was in a position to negotiate her salary."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was in a position to know.

But I was in a position to say so immediately.

News & Media

The Guardian

Mr. Emory was in a position to know.

News & Media

The New York Times

"I don't think I was in a position to reject.

News & Media

The Guardian

Stricker was in a position to win outright.

"I was in a position to say nothing.

News & Media

The New York Times

Finally, the team was in a position to clean.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Everyone was in a position to make change.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"If I was in a position to, yeah.

Lord Hutton was in a position to expose this; he chose not to.

News & Media

The Guardian

But unlike most Alzheimer's caregivers, he was in a position to help others avoid her fate.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was in a position to" to clearly indicate that someone had the necessary resources, authority, or circumstances to take a specific action. It is especially useful when highlighting a missed opportunity or a specific moment of readiness.

Common error

While "was in a position to" is a valid phrase, avoid using it excessively in your writing. Vary your language by using alternatives like "could", "was able to", or "had the opportunity to" to maintain reader engagement and prevent monotony.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was in a position to" functions as a modal expression indicating capability or opportunity within specific circumstances. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used. Examples show it denoting the ability to influence, change or achieve something.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Encyclopedias

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was in a position to" is a frequently used and grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that someone had the capability or opportunity to do something under specific circumstances. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and common usage. Its versatility makes it suitable for various contexts, though it leans towards a more neutral and professional tone. Remember to consider alternatives such as "was able to" or "could" to prevent overuse. This analysis provides practical guidance for employing the phrase effectively in your writing.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was in a position to"?

You can use alternatives like "was able to", "had the opportunity to", or simply "could" depending on the context.

Is "was in a position to" formal or informal?

The phrase "was in a position to" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, simpler alternatives might be preferred in very informal settings.

How to use "was in a position to" in a sentence?

Use "was in a position to" to indicate that someone had the necessary capability or opportunity to do something, for instance: "After the promotion, she was in a position to make significant changes in the department."

What's the difference between "was in a position to" and "could"?

While both indicate ability, "was in a position to" often implies a specific set of circumstances or resources that enabled the action, whereas "could" is a more general statement of ability or possibility.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: