was ignored by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was ignored by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something did not receive attention or consideration from another party. Example: "The proposal was ignored by the committee during the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

She was ignored by Congress.

The Economist

It was ignored by most media".

The New Yorker

It was ignored by the public.

Encyclopedia Britannica

This was ignored by the regime.

The Economist

"He was ignored by the nurses.

Independent

Baran's idea was ignored by the military.

Encyclopedia Britannica

That paragraph was ignored by all the media.

The New Yorker

This petition was ignored by the imperial Qing government.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The place was ignored by the philanthropic and cultural elite.

The New York Times

He said his assessment was ignored by the court.

The Guardian

End result: the order was ignored by the state government.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was ignored by", ensure the subject clearly identifies who or what is doing the ignoring. Clarity prevents ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid passive constructions that obscure who or what is responsible for the act of ignoring. Always ensure the 'by' phrase clearly indicates the agent.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was ignored by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence received no attention or consideration from the agent specified after 'by'. As Ludwig AI confirms, this construction is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Encyclopedias

13%

Science

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was ignored by" is a grammatically correct and very common passive voice construction used to indicate a lack of attention or consideration. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely used across various contexts, especially in News & Media. When employing this phrase, ensure that the agent responsible for the act of ignoring is clearly identified. While the phrase is generally neutral, consider active voice constructions for more direct and engaging writing. Alternatives like "was overlooked by" or "was disregarded by" may be more appropriate depending on the intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was overlooked by

Indicates a failure to notice or consider something, suggesting a more accidental oversight.

was disregarded by

Implies a conscious decision to reject or dismiss something, suggesting a more deliberate act of neglect.

was neglected by

Suggests a failure to care for or attend to something, implying a lack of responsibility or concern.

was unheeded by

Highlights a failure to listen to or pay attention to advice or warnings.

was dismissed by

Focuses on the act of rejecting or treating something as unimportant.

was bypassed by

Suggests a deliberate avoidance or going around something, often to circumvent a problem or obstacle.

was shelved by

Implies that something has been put aside and is not currently being considered or acted upon.

was sidelined by

Suggests that something has been moved to the periphery and is no longer a primary focus.

was repudiated by

Indicates a formal rejection or denial of something, often a statement or belief.

was scorned by

Suggests that something was treated with contempt or disdain.

FAQs

How can I use the phrase "was ignored by" in a sentence?

The phrase "was ignored by" is used to indicate that something or someone did not receive attention or consideration. For example, "The warning signs "were ignored by" the hikers."

What are some alternatives to "was ignored by"?

You can use alternatives such as "was overlooked by", "was disregarded by", or "was neglected by" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "was ignored by" or an active voice construction?

While "was ignored by" is grammatically correct, using an active voice construction (e.g., "The committee ignored the proposal") can often make your writing more direct and engaging. Choose the construction that best suits the tone and purpose of your writing.

What's the difference between "was ignored by" and "was unnoticed by"?

"Was ignored by" implies a conscious or deliberate lack of attention, whereas "was unnoticed by" suggests that something simply failed to be observed or recognized.