was hold

USAGE SUMMARY

The term "was hold" is not grammatically correct in written English.
The correct form of this phrase is "was held." For example, "The meeting was held yesterday in the conference room."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

All I did was hold a fella's hand.

Independent

"All we could say was, 'Hold on, house.

The New York Times

All I could do was hold their hands.

The Guardian

But what we did was hold a peaceful march.

The New York Times

All they had to do was hold on.

The Guardian - Sport

All Hingis had to do was hold on.

The New York Times - Sports

All he had to do was hold his position.

The New York Times - Sports

All she had to do was hold her breath in 733 gallons of water.

The New York Times

The only thing I could do for her was hold her hand.

The New York Times - Sports

At that point, all Berdych had to do was hold serve.

The New York Times - Sports

Of course, my first thought was, Hold on, maybe he had a twin brother.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct past participle form of "hold", which is "held", when constructing passive voice sentences. For example, say "The meeting was held" instead of "The meeting was hold".

Common error

Avoid using the base form of the verb "hold" after "was". Remember that in the passive voice, the past participle "held" is required.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was hold" is grammatically incorrect and does not function as a standard verb phrase in English. Ludwig AI points out that the correct form is "was held".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was hold" is grammatically incorrect in standard English; the correct form is "was held". As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase does not adhere to standard grammatical rules. While some instances of its usage can be found, primarily in science and news media contexts, it is best to avoid this phrase in formal communication. Always opt for ""was held"" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was held

This is the grammatically correct passive form.

was keeping

This alternative implies the action of maintaining possession.

was maintaining

Suggests sustaining or upholding something.

did hold

Emphasizes the action of holding.

used to hold

Indicates a past habit or state.

would hold

Expresses a conditional or repeated action in the past.

had hold

Implies previous control or possession.

started holding

Suggests the beginning of the action of holding.

began to hold

Another way to express the start of holding something.

proceeded to hold

Indicates a continuation or sequence of holding.

FAQs

How do I correctly use "hold" in the past passive voice?

The correct past passive form is "was held". For example, "The event "was held" last week" is correct, whereas "was hold" is incorrect.

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "was hold"?

Use ""was held"". It's the standard past passive construction.

In what contexts is the phrase "was hold" most likely to appear, even if incorrect?

Despite its grammatical error, "was hold" might occasionally appear in informal speech or writing, but it should be avoided in formal contexts. Remember, the proper term is ""was held"".

Is "was hold" ever considered acceptable in English?

No, "was hold" is not considered acceptable in standard English. Always use ""was held"" for the past passive form.