was highlighted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was highlighted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was emphasized or made more noticeable in a text or presentation. Example: "The key points of the presentation were highlighted in bold to draw attention to them."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was highlighted and dog-eared to high heaven.

The Guardian - Opinion

Each subunit was highlighted as green and yellow.

AMB Express

When it was highlighted he paid the money straight back".

BBC

The groove recognition was highlighted to elucidate the specific selectivity.

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Spieth's round was highlighted..

Los Angeles Times

This was highlighted most recently, as Nordstrom responded by dropping the line.

Huffington Post

It was highlighted with games against Georgetown, Duke, Kentucky and Ohio State.

Huffington Post

This was highlighted as beneficial.

BMC Health Services Research

43, 44, 47 A similar issue was highlighted for PCPs.

Clinical interventions in aging

The importance of open, trusting relationships was highlighted.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

A significant increase in two others protein spots was highlighted.

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was highlighted", ensure the context makes clear who did the highlighting and why. This ensures that the emphasis is understood and credible.

Common error

Avoid overusing passive constructions like "was highlighted" as it can make your writing sound less direct and engaging. Sometimes, switching to an active voice can create a stronger impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was highlighted" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject received emphasis or attention. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts. It essentially signifies that something was made prominent or noticeable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

40%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was highlighted" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to emphasize specific information, suitable for various registers. Ludwig AI shows that it serves to draw attention to key points in diverse contexts, from scientific publications to news reports. While effective, avoid overuse by considering active voice alternatives for more direct impact. Remember that while "was highlighted" is proper and versatile, it should be used strategically to guide your audience's focus.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was emphasized

Focuses on the act of stressing the importance of something.

was underscored

Suggests that something was brought to attention in a forceful way.

was brought to the forefront

Indicates that something was moved into a position of prominence.

was given prominence

Implies that importance was assigned to something.

was brought into focus

Emphasizes the act of making something clearer or more distinct.

was pointed out

Indicates that something was specifically mentioned or drawn attention to.

was stressed

Similar to "emphasized", but can also suggest a sense of urgency.

was accentuated

Suggests that something was made more noticeable, often in a subtle way.

was foregrounded

Places something in the immediate focus, making it a central element.

was brought to light

Implies that something previously unknown was revealed or made apparent.

FAQs

How can I use "was highlighted" in a sentence?

You can use "was highlighted" to emphasize or draw attention to specific information. For example, "The importance of data privacy /s/was+highlighted during the conference".

What are some alternatives to "was highlighted"?

Some alternatives include "was emphasized", "was underscored", or "was brought to the forefront", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use the active or passive voice when something needs to be emphasized?

While "was highlighted" (passive voice) is acceptable, using the active voice can sometimes be more direct. For instance, instead of "The issue was highlighted by the report", you could say "The report /s/highlighted+the+issue".

What's the difference between "was highlighted" and "was mentioned"?

"Was mentioned" simply indicates that something was brought up, while "was highlighted" suggests that it was given special attention or importance. Not every item that's /s/was+mentioned gets /s/was+highlighted.