Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was grants
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was grants" is not correct in written English.
It appears to be a grammatical error, as "was" is singular and "grants" is plural, making them incompatible in this context. Example: "The funding was grants provided by the government."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Wiki
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
In the Mortmain (1279), the issue was grants of land to the church.
Wiki
The hall cost NOK 134.6 million, of which NOK 88.5 million was grants from the government.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
His wish was granted.
News & Media
Permission was granted.
News & Media
The order was granted.
News & Media
Its request was granted.
News & Media
His request was granted.
News & Media
Independence was granted on July 12 , 1975
Encyclopedias
So planning permission was granted.
News & Media
He was granted conditional bail.
News & Media
"Permission was granted," he said.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When referring to multiple grants, use the plural verb "were" instead of the singular "was" to ensure grammatical accuracy. For example, use "the funds were grants" not "the funds was grants".
Common error
Avoid using "was" with plural nouns like "grants". Always ensure the verb agrees in number with the subject. Double-check for subject-verb agreement when discussing funding or allocations involving multiple grants.
Source & Trust
74%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was grants" functions as a predicate nominative, attempting to rename or identify the subject. However, it's grammatically incorrect due to subject-verb disagreement. Ludwig AI flags this as a potential grammatical error.
Frequent in
Wiki
50%
News & Media
50%
Science
0%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was grants" is grammatically incorrect because the singular verb "was" does not agree with the plural noun "grants". While Ludwig provides a few examples of its usage, Ludwig AI identifies this phrase as a potential grammatical error and should be avoided in formal writing. Use alternatives such as "were grants" or "was funding" to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity. Always prioritize subject-verb agreement in your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were grants
Changes the verb to the plural form to agree with "grants".
was funding
Replaces "grants" with a singular noun phrase.
constituted grants
Uses a more formal verb to describe the nature of the grants.
involved grants
Indicates that grants were a part of something.
included grants
Similar to 'involved grants', specifying that grants were among other things.
was allotted as grants
Clarifies that something was specifically designated as grants.
was provided through grants
Specifies that grants were the means through which something was provided.
took the form of grants
Highlights the form that something took.
was delivered via grants
Indicates that grants were the delivery mechanism.
represented grants
Indicates that something was, in essence, grants.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "grant" in a sentence when referring to multiple awards?
When referring to multiple awards, use the plural form "grants" with a plural verb like "were". For example, "The funds were grants awarded by the foundation."
What can I say instead of "was grants" to describe financial awards?
Alternatives include "was funding", "were grants", or "consisted of grants" depending on the specific context.
Which is correct, "was grants" or "were grants"?
"Were grants" is the grammatically correct option when referring to multiple grants, as the plural verb "were" agrees with the plural noun "grants".
How do I ensure subject-verb agreement when discussing grants?
If the subject is singular (e.g., "the funding"), use a singular verb (e.g., "was"). If the subject is plural (e.g., "the grants"), use a plural verb (e.g., "were"). For example: "The funding was a grant" versus "The awards were grants".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
74%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested