was given access

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was given access" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone was granted permission or the ability to enter or use something, such as a system, location, or information. Example: "After the security clearance was completed, she was given access to the confidential files."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Before it leaves the French capital, the Guardian was given access to this extraordinary archive.

The Guardian - Arts

I was given access to the empty blocks that were next in line for demolition.

The Guardian

I was given access to a benefits counselor, whom I can call any time.

The New York Times

Morgen was given access to private family tapes and audio footage.

Independent

But a roommate was given access to the apartment and took everything, he said.

The New York Times

Kaoru was given access to a restricted library with Japanese-language books about the history of North Korea.

The New Yorker

The "piano man" was eventually transferred to a psychiatric unit in Dartford, where he was given access to a piano.

The Guardian

After Myra Hindley's death, I was given access to her papers, which I analysed for my book, The Lost Boy.

The Guardian - Opinion

In 2012, the photographer David Allee was given access to the ninety-thousand-square-foot Domino complex.

The New Yorker

A representative of Sussex University's student union, which organised the event, was given access to the tannoy.

The Guardian

Ms. Toledo was given access to the Klein archives, pored over her sketchbooks, and came away unsurprised but inspired.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was given access", ensure the context clearly indicates who granted the access and what was being accessed for clarity. For example, "The journalist was given access to the documents by the whistleblower."

Common error

Avoid passive constructions where the actor granting access is omitted. Instead of "Access was given", specify who granted the access to maintain clarity and accountability. For instance, say "The administrator gave access" rather than "Access was given".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was given access" functions as a passive construction, indicating that someone or something received permission or the means to enter, use, or view something. It highlights the recipient of the access rather than the granter. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Wiki

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was given access" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to indicate that someone received permission or the means to enter, use, or view something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it follows standard grammar rules and is widely used across various reputable sources. It's communicative purpose is to convey the fact that authorization to use something has been granted. While the phrase is generally neutral in register, it is especially frequent in news and media contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying who granted the access and what was being accessed. Common errors include omitting the agent who granted access, leading to unclear sentences. For more formal alternatives, consider "was granted access". Ludwig's examples showcase the breadth of its application.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was granted entry

Focuses on the act of entering a place or system.

was permitted to enter

Highlights the permission aspect of gaining entry.

was authorized to use

Emphasizes the authorization to utilize something.

was allowed to view

Specifically refers to the ability to see or examine something.

was provided with entry

Highlights that entry was actively supplied.

was cleared for entry

Indicates that any barriers or restrictions were removed for entry.

was given the green light

Implies approval or permission to proceed.

was enabled to access

Highlights the action of enabling access.

had access conferred

Focuses on the act of bestowing or granting access formally.

had admittance granted

Stresses the formal granting of permission to enter.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was given access" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was granted access" or "was permitted access". These alternatives emphasize the official or authorized nature of the access provided.

What's the difference between "was given access" and "was granted access"?

While both phrases are similar, "was granted access" often suggests a more formal or official authorization process compared to "was given access", which can imply a more casual or informal provision of access.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when writing about access?

While "was given access" uses passive voice, active voice can sometimes be more direct and clear. For example, instead of "He was given access to the files", you could say "They granted him access to the files". The best choice depends on the context and desired emphasis.

What are some alternatives to "was given access" that avoid passive voice?

To avoid passive voice, try using active constructions such as "received access to", "obtained access to", or "gained access to". These options place the subject in a more active role.