Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was generated with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was generated with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the tool, method, or source that produced something, often in contexts related to technology or creative works. Example: "The report was generated with the latest data analysis software to ensure accuracy."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The figure was generated with Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith 1998).
Science
Green structured light was generated with a Miroir 720p picoprojector.
Science & Research
An antisense riboprobe was generated with T3 RNA polymerase.
Science & Research
The heatmap was generated with Z-score normalized FPKM values.
Science & Research
The design was generated with the student-built SLIDE CAD system at U.C. Berkeley.
This figure was generated with QGIS software version 2.18 Las Palmas (available at: www.qgis.org).org
Science & Research
The thickest, and therefore darkest surface was generated with a charge of 1.26 Coulomb (C).
Science & Research
Map was generated with Surfer program (version 8, Golden Software, Inc., Golden, CO, USA, https://www.goldensoftware.com/).com/
Science & Research
Intensity-modulated display mode was generated with a full-spectrum lookup table.
Science & Research
cDNA and cRNA was generated with Illumina TotalPrep RNA Amplifcation Kit (Life Technologies; AMIL1791).
Science & Research
The box and whisker plot was generated with defaulting statistical settings with BoxPlorR (http://boxplot.tyerslab.com/).
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing a technical process, be specific about the tool or method used with "was generated with" to enhance clarity and reproducibility. For example, "The graph was generated with Matplotlib using the provided dataset."
Common error
Ensure that it's clear what exactly "was generated with". Vague sentences like "The report was generated with the system" can be improved by naming the specific software or module used.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was generated with" functions as a passive construction indicating the means by which something was produced or created. It highlights the tools, methods, or materials involved. According to Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
80%
Academia
10%
Formal & Business
3%
Less common in
News & Media
2%
Wiki
2%
Encyclopedias
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was generated with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, particularly in scientific and academic writing. According to Ludwig, it effectively conveys how something was created, emphasizing the tools, methods, or materials employed in the process. While versatile, it's best suited for formal contexts and technical descriptions. For clarity, always specify what "was generated with" to avoid ambiguity. While synonyms like "was created using" or "was produced by" exist, "was generated with" offers a specific focus on the means of production, making it ideal for detailed and reproducible descriptions.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was created using
Emphasizes the act of creation more directly, suggesting a deliberate process.
was produced by means of
More formal and technical, highlighting the method or instrument used in production.
was made employing
Highlights the use of a specific tool or technique during the making process.
was derived from
Focuses on the origin or source from which something was obtained or developed.
was synthesized utilizing
Suggests a more complex or chemical process of creation.
was developed through
Highlights the process of development and the steps involved.
was constructed with
Emphasizes the building or assembly aspect of the creation process.
was fashioned out of
Suggests a more artistic or crafted creation.
was built upon
Focuses on previous work or elements that served as a foundation.
was formed via
Indicates a particular pathway or mechanism by which something came into being.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "was generated with" in a sentence?
You can use alternatives like "was created using", "was produced by", or "was derived from" depending on the context.
Is it grammatically correct to say "was generated with"?
Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase "was generated with" is a passive construction indicating that something was produced or created by means of a particular tool, method, or substance.
What is the difference between "was generated with" and "was created by"?
"Was created by" typically refers to the agent or entity responsible for the creation, whereas "was generated with" often specifies the instrument, tool, or method used in the process. For example, "The report was created by the marketing team" versus "The report was generated with data analysis software".
In what contexts is "was generated with" most appropriate?
The phrase "was generated with" is often used in technical, scientific, or academic contexts to describe how data, images, or other outputs were produced. It's particularly suitable when you need to specify the tools or methods employed.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested