Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was generalized

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was generalized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process where something has been made more general or broad in scope, often in a scientific or analytical context. Example: "The findings from the study were generalized to apply to a larger population."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mr. Méndez said that torture in Mexico was "generalized," a finding that was disputed by the Mexican government.

News & Media

The New York Times

Judas's physical repulsiveness was generalized to the Jews — for who were they, as St. Jerome said, but "the sons of Judas"?

News & Media

The New Yorker

This verb was generalized, as linguists like Sol Steinmetz say, into touching the numbers on a touch-tone phone that has no dial.

The dilemma was generalized by William Rowe (1975).

Science

SEP

Recently, this notion was generalized to estimators.

This theorem was generalized in [5].

Their definition was generalized in [2].

Hyers' theorem was generalized in various directions.

Moreover, the cluster configuration was generalized to irregular wind farms.

This result was generalized to any dimensions in [123].

This study was generalized by Schwartz in [47].

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was generalized" to indicate that a concept, method, or finding has been extended to apply in a wider range of situations or contexts. Ensure that the context clearly specifies what is being generalized and the scope of the generalization.

Common error

Be cautious of overusing "was generalized" without providing sufficient evidence or justification. Ensure the generalization is valid and doesn't lead to inaccurate or misleading conclusions. Always provide the necessary context to understand the original scope and the new, broader application.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was generalized" functions as a passive verb construction, indicating that a subject has undergone a process of generalization. It is frequently used to describe how concepts or methods have been extended in scope, as evidenced by the examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

12%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was generalized" is a versatile term primarily used in formal and scientific contexts to describe the process of making something more widely applicable. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically correct and frequently used, especially in academic and research papers. When using "was generalized", it's essential to provide clear context regarding what is being generalized and its new scope. Alternatives include "was broadened" or "was expanded". Be mindful of overgeneralization, and always ensure that the extension is valid and supported by evidence.

FAQs

How is "was generalized" typically used in academic writing?

In academic writing, "was generalized" often describes how a specific finding, theory, or method has been expanded to apply to a broader set of cases or a larger population. It's crucial to clearly state the original scope and the new scope to which it "was extended".

What's the difference between "was generalized" and "was specialized"?

"Was generalized" means something became more broad or applicable in more situations, while "was specialized" means something became more focused or tailored for specific situations. They are antonyms, representing opposite directions in scope.

Can you provide examples of how "was generalized" is used in scientific research?

In scientific research, "was generalized" can refer to how a model, equation, or experimental result has been made applicable to a larger class of phenomena. For instance, "The original equation for fluid flow was generalized to account for non-Newtonian fluids."

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "was generalized" in a sentence?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "was broadened", "was expanded", or "was made more general". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: