was funded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was funded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that financial support was provided for a project, initiative, or organization in the past. Example: "The research project was funded by a government grant to explore renewable energy sources."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

First, it was funded privately.

The New York Times

I'm sure that was funded.

The New Yorker

None was funded by industry.

The Guardian

(The project was funded by a Kickstarter).

The New York Times

It was funded by the film industry.

The Guardian

The action was funded by the LNP.

The Guardian

It was funded by the C.I.A.

The New Yorker

Mr. Wark's study was funded by NOAA.

The New York Times

Adaptive was funded by NET in 1988.

Forbes

It worked--his application was funded.

Science Magazine

The study was funded by Mzumbe University.

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was funded", clearly state the source of the funding to provide context and credibility. For example, "The study was funded by the National Science Foundation."

Common error

Ensure that it's clear what "was funded". Avoid vague sentences where the subject of funding is unclear or ambiguous. For example, instead of "The project was funded", specify "The renewable energy project was funded by a private investor".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was funded" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject received financial resources. It typically appears in declarative sentences to convey information about the financial backing of a project, study, or organization, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was funded" is a grammatically sound and widely used passive verb phrase that indicates financial backing. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and usability across various contexts. It is most frequently found in scientific, news, and formal business settings, serving to inform the audience about the source of funding for a particular project or initiative. While alternative phrases like "received financial support" or "obtained funding" exist, the choice depends on the specific emphasis desired. When using "was funded", be sure to clearly specify the subject and source of the funding to avoid ambiguity and ensure clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

received financial support

Emphasizes the reception of support, highlighting the beneficiary rather than the act of funding.

was financially supported

Similar in meaning, but adds emphasis on the financial aspect of the support.

obtained funding

Focuses on the act of acquiring funding, suggesting a more active role.

secured funding

Implies a competitive process or effort to obtain the funding.

was granted funds

Highlights the act of being officially given funds, often by an institution.

was backed financially

Suggests strong financial commitment and belief in the project or entity.

had resources allocated

Focuses on the allocation of resources rather than just financial aspects.

was endowed

Implies a long-term or permanent source of funding, often for institutions.

was underwritten

Suggests a guarantee of financial support, often in business contexts.

was capitalized

Implies that the entity received capital investment. Often used in business.

FAQs

How can I use "was funded" in a sentence?

Use "was funded" to indicate that something received financial support. For example, "The research project /s/was+funded by a private foundation".

What are some alternatives to saying "was funded"?

Alternatives include "received financial support", "obtained funding", or "was financially supported". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing funding?

Whether to use active or passive voice depends on the focus. "The foundation funded the project" (active) emphasizes the foundation's role. "The project /s/was+funded by the foundation" (passive) emphasizes the project itself.

What's the difference between "was funded" and "is funded"?

"Was funded" indicates that the funding occurred in the past. "Is funded" implies that the funding is current or ongoing. For example, "The program /s/was+funded for three years" versus "The program /s/is+funded through annual donations".