Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was formerly recognized
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was formerly recognized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was acknowledged or accepted in the past but may not be currently recognized. Example: "The species was formerly recognized as a distinct subspecies before further research reclassified it."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Encyclopedias
Wiki
Alternative expressions(20)
was previously known as
was once considered
had been recognized
was previously celebrated
used to be called
formerly named
once known as
historically called
previously identified as
was once known as
was then known as
previously named
originally called
formerly designated as
is now known as
has since been renamed
at one time was referred to as
historically known as
was later known as
was formerly known as
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
(2) The family Myobatrachidae and Limnodynastidae includes what were formerly recognized as Old World members of the Leptodactylidae, a family now considered restricted to the New World.
Encyclopedias
Beginning in the 1980s, significant rearrangements were made by the Swedish botanist Rolf Dahlgren and his colleagues to the genera and families that were formerly recognized in the subclass Liliidae in the Cronquist botanical classification system.
Encyclopedias
The red ruffed lemur and the black-and-white ruffed lemur were formerly recognized as subspecies, Varecia variegata rubra and Varecia variegata variegata respectively.
Wiki
The tribe was formerly federally recognized as the "Monterey Band of Monterey County" (1906 1908).
Wiki
Below: any New Orleans resident will recognize this as what was formerly the porch of a "double shotgun," our term for a long, narrow two-family residence.
News & Media
The species P. slowinskii was formerly considered Pantherophis (Elaphe) guttatus, and was recently recognized as a distinct species [ 30].
Science
It is possible that the additional proportion of this sequence was formerly repetitive and has since decayed beyond our ability to recognize it as such.
Science
Within the mostly opisthoglyphic clade of pseudoxyrhophiines, the currently monotypic Parastenophis was formerly a subgenus within the genus Stenophis (now considered paraphyletic, see [ 75]), which also included the currently recognized species in the genera Phisalixella and Lycodryas.
Science
He was formerly an offshore oil engineer.
News & Media
Lead mining was formerly of economic importance.
Encyclopedias
Flogging was formerly executed with great brutality.
Encyclopedias
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was formerly recognized", ensure the context clearly indicates what it is currently known or considered as. This provides clarity and avoids confusion.
Common error
Avoid using "was formerly recognized" without specifying what the subject is currently understood to be. Lack of context can leave the reader uninformed and create ambiguity.
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was formerly recognized" functions as a passive construction, indicating a state or condition that existed in the past. It highlights a shift in understanding or classification, as evidenced by examples in Ludwig.
Frequent in
Science
33%
Encyclopedias
33%
Wiki
33%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was formerly recognized" serves to indicate a past state of acknowledgment or understanding that has since changed. Grammatically correct, it's frequently used in scientific and encyclopedic contexts to denote shifts in classifications or knowledge. As noted, Ludwig's AI affirms its correct usage. When employing this phrase, it's best practice to clarify the current understanding or state to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "used to be recognized" or "was previously known as" can offer nuanced variations depending on the specific context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
used to be recognized
Focuses on past recognition without necessarily implying a formal change.
was previously known as
Emphasizes a prior name or label.
was once considered
Highlights a past belief or opinion that has since changed.
had been recognized
Indicates a state of recognition that existed before a specific point in time.
was earlier acknowledged as
Highlights an initial acknowledgment.
was initially classified as
Specifies a prior classification that has been revised.
was originally identified as
Focuses on the initial identification.
was at one time recognized
Emphasizes a recognition that occurred in the past but is no longer current.
used to be classified
Indicates a past taxonomic classification.
was formerly identified
Highlights a change in a previous identification.
FAQs
How can I use "was formerly recognized" in a sentence?
Use "was formerly recognized" to indicate that something used to be acknowledged or accepted in the past but may not be currently recognized. For example, "The species was formerly recognized as a distinct subspecies before further research reclassified it."
What can I say instead of "was formerly recognized"?
You can use alternatives like "used to be recognized", "was previously known as", or "was once considered" depending on the context.
What's the difference between "was formerly recognized" and "is currently recognized"?
"Was formerly recognized" indicates a past acknowledgment that is no longer current, while "is currently recognized" implies present acknowledgment or acceptance.
Is it correct to use "was formerly recognized" in formal writing?
Yes, "was formerly recognized" is appropriate for formal writing, particularly in academic or scientific contexts where historical perspectives are important.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested