was fed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was fed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to say that someone provided food or other nourishment to something or someone. For example: "The baby was fed a bottle of warm milk."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I was fed up.

The New York Times

Enid Cruz was fed up.

The New York Times

He was fed up Saturday.

The New York Times - Sports

Everyone was fed up.

The Guardian - Sport

It was fed to me wrong".

Independent

I was fed up with worrying.

The New Yorker

Later, Ruth was fed intravenously.

The New York Times - Science

But I was fed up with it".

The Economist

MARY WOODS was fed up.

The New York Times

Ms. Dias was fed up.

The New York Times

Jacey Eckhart was fed up.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the passive reception of nourishment, use "was fed" to clearly indicate that someone or something received food or sustenance. This is particularly useful in scientific or descriptive contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "was feed" (incorrect past participle) or overly informal substitutes like "got food" in formal writing. "Was fed" clearly conveys the passive action of receiving nourishment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was fed" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that the subject received nourishment or was supplied with something. According to Ludwig, it signifies the act of providing food or other sustenance to someone or something. Examples show its usage in contexts ranging from literal feeding to metaphorical input of information.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was fed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive voice construction that describes the act of receiving nourishment or sustenance. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread usage across diverse contexts, from scientific reports to news articles. Its register is generally neutral, suitable for both formal and informal settings. Common applications include describing the literal act of feeding, as well as the metaphorical input of information. When using "was fed", ensure that the context clearly indicates a passive reception of something beneficial or necessary. Alternatives such as "received nourishment" or "was provided with food" can be used to add variety, although they may subtly alter the emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was given food

This alternative emphasizes the act of giving food, simplifying the original phrase.

was provided with food

This phrase emphasizes the act of providing food, offering a more descriptive alternative.

was nourished

This alternative focuses on the result of feeding, emphasizing sustenance and health.

received nourishment

This alternative focuses on the act of receiving sustenance, rather than the provision of it.

was supplied with nutrition

This phrase is more formal, focusing on the nutritional aspect of feeding.

had sustenance

This phrase emphasizes the provision of essential resources for survival.

consumed

This term highlights the act of using up or eating food.

was sustained

This term highlights the continuous support provided by feeding.

ingested

This is a more formal and technical term for eating or taking in food.

was catered to

This alternative implies a more elaborate or luxurious feeding process.

FAQs

How can I use "was fed" in a sentence?

Use "was fed" to describe a passive action where someone or something received food or nourishment. For example, "The baby was fed a bottle" or "The data was fed into the algorithm".

What are some alternatives to "was fed"?

Alternatives include "received nourishment", "was provided with food", or "consumed" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was feed" instead of "was fed"?

No, "was feed" is grammatically incorrect. The correct past participle of "feed" is "fed". Therefore, you should always use "was fed".

What's the difference between "was fed" and "fed"?

"Was fed" indicates a passive voice, meaning the subject received the action. "Fed", without the auxiliary verb "was", can be used in the active voice or as a simple past tense verb.