Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was explicitly excluded

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was explicitly excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been clearly and intentionally left out or not included in a particular context or document. Example: "The clause regarding overtime pay was explicitly excluded from the contract, leading to confusion among the employees."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

You'll notice that it was explicitly excluded from all of Google and Verizon's noble talk of "empowering" consumers.

News & Media

TechCrunch

In recent years, public interest has been further defined and distinguished from citizens' submissions to the central government; the development of real estate was explicitly excluded.

As he notes, this was always a bit strange, given that borrowing for investment was explicitly excluded from Mr Osborne's deficit target.

News & Media

BBC

Obesity treatment was explicitly excluded in the current study.

Bottled water was explicitly excluded from the definition of improved water.

Testing for HIV was explicitly excluded as it was assumed to interfere with the willingness to participate in the study.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Victims of rape and incest are explicitly excluded.

The Libyans were aggrieved, he said, that the Scottish government wanted Megrahi to be explicitly excluded from the PTA.

News & Media

The Guardian

They would be explicitly excluded from new tax credits intended to make premiums affordable for people who make up to four times the federal poverty level -- or $88,200 for a family of four.

News & Media

The New York Times

No, it did what it was tasked to do and minimum staffing levels were explicitly excluded from its brief, but much more is needed to consistently ensure safe nurse staffing levels in the NHS.

News & Media

The Guardian

This is already the case for scientific papers published by researchers at the N.I.H. campus in Bethesda, Md., whose work, as government employees, has been explicitly excluded from copyright protection since 1976.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was explicitly excluded" to clearly indicate a deliberate decision to omit something, leaving no room for ambiguity. This is especially useful in legal, technical, or formal contexts where precision is crucial.

Common error

Avoid using "was explicitly excluded" in casual conversation or informal writing, as it can sound overly formal or stilted. Opt for simpler alternatives like "was left out" or "wasn't included" instead.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was explicitly excluded" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something was intentionally and overtly omitted from a particular set of conditions or considerations. It emphasizes the deliberate nature of the exclusion. Ludwig AI highlights that this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was explicitly excluded" is a grammatically correct and useful construction for clearly stating that something has been intentionally omitted. Ludwig AI shows that it is commonly used in science, news, and formal business contexts. While effective for precision, it can sound overly formal in casual settings. Therefore, consider context when choosing this phrase and explore alternatives like "was intentionally left out" or "was deliberately excluded" for softer communication. Ultimately, the clarity and directness of "was explicitly excluded" make it a valuable tool when precision is paramount.

FAQs

What does "was explicitly excluded" mean?

The phrase "was explicitly excluded" means that something was intentionally and clearly left out or not included in a particular situation, rule, or document.

How can I use "was explicitly excluded" in a sentence?

You can use "was explicitly excluded" to emphasize that the exclusion was deliberate and clearly stated. For instance, "Overtime pay "was expressly omitted" from the contract to reduce costs".

What are some alternatives to "was explicitly excluded"?

Some alternatives include "was intentionally left out", "was deliberately excluded", or "was specifically not included", depending on the level of formality and emphasis you want to convey.

Is it better to say "was explicitly excluded" or "was implicitly excluded"?

It depends on the context. "Was explicitly excluded" means the exclusion was clearly stated, while "was implicitly excluded" suggests the exclusion was understood but not directly stated. Choose the phrase that accurately reflects the situation.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: