Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was explicitly excluded
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was explicitly excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been clearly and intentionally left out or not included in a particular context or document. Example: "The clause regarding overtime pay was explicitly excluded from the contract, leading to confusion among the employees."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
7 human-written examples
You'll notice that it was explicitly excluded from all of Google and Verizon's noble talk of "empowering" consumers.
News & Media
In recent years, public interest has been further defined and distinguished from citizens' submissions to the central government; the development of real estate was explicitly excluded.
As he notes, this was always a bit strange, given that borrowing for investment was explicitly excluded from Mr Osborne's deficit target.
News & Media
Obesity treatment was explicitly excluded in the current study.
Science
Bottled water was explicitly excluded from the definition of improved water.
Testing for HIV was explicitly excluded as it was assumed to interfere with the willingness to participate in the study.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
53 human-written examples
Victims of rape and incest are explicitly excluded.
News & Media
The Libyans were aggrieved, he said, that the Scottish government wanted Megrahi to be explicitly excluded from the PTA.
News & Media
They would be explicitly excluded from new tax credits intended to make premiums affordable for people who make up to four times the federal poverty level -- or $88,200 for a family of four.
News & Media
No, it did what it was tasked to do and minimum staffing levels were explicitly excluded from its brief, but much more is needed to consistently ensure safe nurse staffing levels in the NHS.
News & Media
This is already the case for scientific papers published by researchers at the N.I.H. campus in Bethesda, Md., whose work, as government employees, has been explicitly excluded from copyright protection since 1976.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was explicitly excluded" to clearly indicate a deliberate decision to omit something, leaving no room for ambiguity. This is especially useful in legal, technical, or formal contexts where precision is crucial.
Common error
Avoid using "was explicitly excluded" in casual conversation or informal writing, as it can sound overly formal or stilted. Opt for simpler alternatives like "was left out" or "wasn't included" instead.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was explicitly excluded" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something was intentionally and overtly omitted from a particular set of conditions or considerations. It emphasizes the deliberate nature of the exclusion. Ludwig AI highlights that this phrase is grammatically correct.
Frequent in
Science
43%
News & Media
40%
Formal & Business
17%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was explicitly excluded" is a grammatically correct and useful construction for clearly stating that something has been intentionally omitted. Ludwig AI shows that it is commonly used in science, news, and formal business contexts. While effective for precision, it can sound overly formal in casual settings. Therefore, consider context when choosing this phrase and explore alternatives like "was intentionally left out" or "was deliberately excluded" for softer communication. Ultimately, the clarity and directness of "was explicitly excluded" make it a valuable tool when precision is paramount.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was deliberately excluded
Similar to the original, but substitutes "explicitly" with "deliberately", focusing on the intent.
was expressly omitted
Replaces "explicitly excluded" with "expressly omitted", indicating a deliberate act of leaving something out.
was specifically not included
Emphasizes the specific decision not to include something.
was intentionally left out
Uses simpler language to convey the idea of something being purposely not included.
was omitted on purpose
Simple and direct way of stating that something was left out intentionally.
was purposefully removed
Focuses on the action of removing something with a specific purpose.
was consciously disregarded
Highlights that something was considered but then intentionally ignored.
was precluded by design
More formal phrasing, indicating that the exclusion was part of the initial plan.
was strategically avoided
Suggests that the exclusion was a strategic decision to avoid certain consequences.
was banished from consideration
Emphasizes a strong and decisive exclusion, suggesting something was actively prevented from being considered.
FAQs
What does "was explicitly excluded" mean?
The phrase "was explicitly excluded" means that something was intentionally and clearly left out or not included in a particular situation, rule, or document.
How can I use "was explicitly excluded" in a sentence?
You can use "was explicitly excluded" to emphasize that the exclusion was deliberate and clearly stated. For instance, "Overtime pay "was expressly omitted" from the contract to reduce costs".
What are some alternatives to "was explicitly excluded"?
Some alternatives include "was intentionally left out", "was deliberately excluded", or "was specifically not included", depending on the level of formality and emphasis you want to convey.
Is it better to say "was explicitly excluded" or "was implicitly excluded"?
It depends on the context. "Was explicitly excluded" means the exclusion was clearly stated, while "was implicitly excluded" suggests the exclusion was understood but not directly stated. Choose the phrase that accurately reflects the situation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested