was experience with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was experience with" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "had experience with"? You can use "had experience with" when discussing someone's past involvement or familiarity with a particular subject, skill, or situation. Example: "She had experience with project management before joining the team."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Rather, what most entrepreneurs lacked was experience with business issues such as data-driven user acquisition, talent retention, knowing when to upgrade legacy infrastructure, or expanding across borders.

TechCrunch

The criterion for including ICU workers in the study was experience with ICU diaries.

Critical Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Three years ago I was experiencing with this specific process.

Huffington Post

But I was experienced with not understanding communications, so I knew what to do.

Huffington Post

It was intimidating and reminiscent of the emotional abuse I was experiencing with my father".

Vice

In addition, considerable difficulty was experienced with data collection in all settings.

British Journal of Cancer

For the most part, no increase in detection sensitivity was experienced with higher heritability.

BioData Mining

No clinically relevant adverse effect other than metabolic alkalosis was experienced with angiotensin infusion.

Critical Care

StSt lead the osteotomy as he was experienced with this tool from oral surgery.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

The involved neurologist was experienced with more than 20 years in practice.

BMJ Open

If you're experienced with service innovation in the sector, then what are you waiting for?

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct past tense form, such as "had experience with" or "was experienced in", to ensure grammatical accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using "was experience with" as it is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use the verb "to have" (e.g., "had experience with") or a suitable adjective (e.g., "was experienced in") to express past involvement or knowledge.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was experience with" is an incorrect grammatical construction. Ludwig AI indicates the correct usage involves using the verb "to have" (e.g., "had experience with") or rephrasing to use "experienced with" after a form of "to be."

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was experience with" is grammatically incorrect. As indicated by Ludwig AI, the correct form is "had experience with" or rephrasing the sentence. Though examples can be found across diverse sources, including news and scientific articles, the usage is non-standard and likely erroneous. To ensure clarity and correctness, writers should use ""had experience with"" or similar alternatives to accurately convey previous involvement or familiarity with a subject. Correct alternatives include "was familiar with", "had exposure to", and "was acquainted with".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had experience with

Uses "had" to form a grammatically correct past tense indicating previous involvement.

possessed experience with

Replaces "had" with "possessed", offering a more formal way to indicate previous involvement.

was familiar with

Shifts from "experience" to "familiar", focusing on knowledge and understanding.

had exposure to

Focuses on being introduced to or encountering something, rather than direct involvement.

was acquainted with

Highlights being personally aware of or having met something, often in a professional context.

gained experience in

Emphasizes the process of acquiring knowledge or skill through active participation.

developed expertise in

Suggests a higher level of skill and knowledge acquired over time.

had a background in

Indicates a foundational level of knowledge and training in a specific area.

was proficient in

Highlights competence and skill in a particular area or task.

was versed in

Implies deep knowledge and understanding of a subject, often through study or practice.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say someone had previous involvement with something?

The correct way to express that someone had previous involvement with something is to say "had experience with". For example: "She "had experience with" project management before joining the team."

What can I say instead of "was experience with"?

Instead of "was experience with", use grammatically correct alternatives such as ""had experience with"" or "was familiar with" to convey the intended meaning accurately.

Is "was experience with" grammatically correct?

No, "was experience with" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage involves using "had experience with" or rephrasing the sentence to use "experienced with" after a form of the verb "to be", like "is experienced with" or "are experienced with".

How does "had experience with" differ from "was experienced with"?

"Had experience with" indicates that someone possessed experience, while "was experienced with" describes someone's state of being experienced in a particular field. For example, "He had experience with coding" versus "He is experienced with coding".