Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was expected at

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was expected at" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a time or place where someone or something was anticipated to arrive or occur. Example: "The train was expected at the station by 3 PM."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

McDonald's was expected at any minute.

He said he was expected at a Maoist meeting.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Mr. Huntsman was expected at the school at noon.

News & Media

The New York Times

When told that former President Bill Clinton was expected at courtside, Carnesecca looked intrigued.

But that was expected at the annual Explorers Club dinner at the Waldorf-Astoria.

He was expected at a nearby Lutheran church by a group of local clergy.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Poor weather was expected at the backup landing site in Southern California.

News & Media

The New York Times

The reopening was expected at the end of this September and then by year's end.

Discussion on the report was expected at last night's UA Senate meeting but was postponed until the next Senate meeting.

Based on GIAM-modeled carbon prices, little carbon sequestration was expected at 2015 under any global outlook.

Severe congestion was expected at rush hour elsewhere as passengers attempt to use other methods of travel.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was expected at" to clearly communicate an anticipation or scheduled event, ensuring the context provides clarity on who or what was expected.

Common error

Avoid using "was expected to at" as it creates a redundant prepositional phrase. Stick to "was expected at" for conciseness and clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was expected at" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that someone or something was anticipated to be present at a specific location or event. Ludwig examples showcase its use in various contexts, reflecting this primary function.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

18%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was expected at" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate anticipation or a scheduled presence at a particular place or event. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s a versatile phrase found most frequently in news and media, but also appearing in scientific and academic contexts. Related phrases offer nuanced alternatives, while avoiding common errors like "was expected to at" enhances clarity. When writing, use this phrase to create clear expectations, remembering that "was expected at" conveys a stronger certainty than alternatives like "was supposed to be at".

FAQs

How can I use "was expected at" in a sentence?

Use "was expected at" to indicate a scheduled or anticipated presence at a particular location or event. For example, "The speaker was expected at the conference", or "The package was expected at the office today".

What can I say instead of "was expected at"?

You can use alternatives like "was anticipated at", "was scheduled to be at", or "was due to appear at" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was expected to be at" instead of "was expected at"?

While "was expected to be at" isn't grammatically incorrect, "was expected at" is more concise and often preferred. The inclusion of "to be" doesn't typically add significant meaning and can make the sentence sound slightly awkward.

What's the difference between "was expected at" and "was supposed to be at"?

"Was expected at" implies a firm expectation based on a schedule or arrangement. "Was supposed to be at" suggests an arrangement that may or may not have been fulfilled, implying a possibility that the expectation wasn't met.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: