was estimated at

USAGE SUMMARY

"was estimated at" is correct and can be used in written English.
This phrase is often used to talk about an estimation of quantity, time, or cost. For example, "The cost of the project was estimated at $50,000."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Spending was estimated at almost $40 million.

The New York Times

The cost was estimated at €5.5m ($7.43m).

The Economist

It was estimated at $10 million to 15 million.

The New York Times - Arts

The price was estimated at about $1.1 million.

The New York Times

Damage was estimated at more than $500 million.

The New York Times

Spending was estimated at less than $5 million.

The New York Times

Today's crowd was estimated at 65,000.

The New York Times - Sports

Total spending was estimated at $125 million.

The New York Times

Combined spending was estimated at $50 million.

The New York Times

Spending was estimated at $80 million annually.

The New York Times

Marketing spending was estimated at $20 million.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was estimated at", ensure that the source of the estimation is clear to maintain credibility. For instance, specify who made the estimate or the method used.

Common error

Avoid using "was estimated at" when an exact figure is known. This phrase is appropriate only when dealing with approximations or predictions, not precise values.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was estimated at" functions as a passive construction indicating an approximation or assessment of a value, quantity, or extent. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used. Examples show its application in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Wiki

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was estimated at" is a grammatically correct and versatile construction used to indicate an approximate value or quantity. As Ludwig AI indicates, its broad applicability spans from news reports and wiki articles to more formal business and academic contexts. While predominantly used in news and media, its presence across various domains underscores its utility in conveying estimations where precise figures are not available or necessary. When using this phrase, ensure the source of the estimation is clear to maintain credibility and avoid using it when exact figures are known.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was approximated to be

Emphasizes a rough calculation or close resemblance.

was valued at approximately

Highlights the assessed worth and introduces an element of inexactness.

was considered to be around

Suggests a less formal estimation, implying a range.

was assessed in the vicinity of

Indicates a judgment within a certain range.

was believed to be about

Focuses on a general belief or opinion regarding the value.

was projected to reach

Specifically refers to a future estimation or forecast.

was forecast to be nearly

Emphasizes a prediction close to a specific value.

was pegged at roughly

Implies a less precise estimate, using 'roughly' to indicate approximation.

was deemed to be in the neighborhood of

Expresses an assessment within a close range, less specific.

was speculated to cost

Highlights that the value is based on speculation or conjecture.

FAQs

How can I use "was estimated at" in a sentence?

Use "was estimated at" to indicate an approximate value or quantity. For example, "The damage from the storm was estimated at $1 million."

What are some alternatives to "was estimated at"?

You can use alternatives like "was approximated to be", "was valued at approximately", or "was considered to be around" depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "was estimated at" in formal writing?

Yes, "was estimated at" is suitable for formal writing, especially when precision is not possible or necessary. It conveys that the figure is an approximation based on available data.

What's the difference between "was estimated at" and "was calculated at"?

"Was calculated at" implies a precise computation, while "was estimated at" suggests an approximate or judgmental assessment. Use "was calculated at" when a formula or algorithm provides the value.