Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was employed with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was employed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe someone's previous job or position within a company or organization. Example: "She was employed with the company for over five years before moving on to a new opportunity."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(17)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
A split-plot experimental design was employed with 3 replications.
Science
Mr. Patton was employed with New York State Department of Mental Hygiene from 1953 to 1978.
News & Media
It was a title, Del Bosque says, that was employed with a combination of aprecio y desprecio – fondness and dismissiveness.
News & Media
The cell adhesion test was employed with pre-osteoblast to evaluate the cytocompatibility of Ta coating.
Science
A 2 × 4 factorial design was employed, with species and season as independent factors.
A prospective questionnaire design was employed with 197, 13 14 year olds (76 males, 121 females).
Science
A descriptive discriminant analysis was employed with a sample of secondary school students.
A three-dimensional, non-isothermal model was employed with a single straight channel.
A mixed-method approach was employed with survey, interview, and text analysis for data gathering.
A quasi-experimental design was employed with university students participating in the experiment.
Science
In this work, this methodology was employed with soybean lecithin, a biocompatible surfactant.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing past employment, be specific about the dates of employment and the role held. For example, instead of saying "He "was employed with" a company", specify "He "was employed with" Acme Corp from 2010 to 2015 as a project manager".
Common error
Avoid using "was employed in" when referring to a company. While "in" can describe a field of work (e.g., "was employed in marketing"), "with" correctly indicates the employer (e.g., ""was employed with" Google").
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was employed with" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating a past employment relationship. It connects an individual to a specific organization or entity where they previously worked. Ludwig AI affirms the correctness and usability of this phrase.
Frequent in
Science
42%
News & Media
30%
Formal & Business
28%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was employed with" is a grammatically correct and commonly used way to describe a past employment relationship. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its validity and widespread use. While alternatives like "worked for" and "worked at" exist, "was employed with" is suitable for professional contexts and emphasizes a formal employment connection. It's important to use "with" when referring to a specific company, and "in" for a field or industry. Predominantly used in science, news, and formal business contexts, this phrase serves to convey background information about an individual's work experience.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
worked at
Focuses on the place of employment rather than the specific nature of the job.
was an employee of
Highlights the employer-employee relationship.
was in the service of
Emphasizes serving an organization or cause.
held a position at
Highlights the specific role or title at a company.
was affiliated with
Indicates a connection or association, not necessarily direct employment.
was on the staff of
Implies being part of a team or workforce.
was associated with
Suggests a less formal connection than direct employment.
was contracted by
Indicates a contractual agreement for services.
was hired by
Focuses on the act of being recruited for a job.
served with
Implies a more dedicated or purposeful employment.
FAQs
What's the difference between "was employed with" and "worked for"?
While both phrases indicate past employment, "worked for" is more common and versatile. "Was employed with" is often used in more formal contexts or to emphasize a formal employment relationship.
What can I say instead of "was employed with"?
You can use alternatives like "worked at", "was an employee of", or "held a position at" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "was employed in" a company?
It is generally more correct to say ""was employed with"" when referring to a company directly. "Was employed in" is better suited for describing a field or industry, such as "was employed in the tech industry".
How to use "was employed with" in a sentence?
Use "was employed with" to indicate a past employment relationship, for instance, "She "was employed with" the U.S. Postal Service in Connecticut." Ensure the context clearly specifies the employer.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested